Two-Step Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Lignocellulosic Biomass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials is inefficient due to the crystalline structure of hemi-cellulose being entrapped in a network of lignin, resulting in slow and incomplete conversion to reducing sugars, leading to high costs and energy consumption in bio-ethanol production.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a two-step enzymatic hydrolysis with a first endoglucanase-rich enzyme composition for liquefaction to reduce viscosity and a cellulase-rich composition for saccharification, using thermostable enzymes to optimize temperature and enzyme dosage for higher sugar yields and reduced enzyme costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional single-step enzymatic hydrolysis is used, then the process is simple, but the conversion of cellulose to reducing sugars is slow and incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rate of cellulose to reducing sugarsVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrolysis process is divided into two distinct sequential steps: a liquefaction step using endoglucanase-rich enzyme composition to break down cellulose structure, followed by a saccharification step using cellulase-rich enzyme composition to convert cellulose to reducing sugars. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized for its specific function, improving overall conversion efficiency while maintaining manageable process complexity through structured division of operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The liquefaction step serves as a preliminary action that pre-treats the cellulose structure by breaking down crystalline regions and reducing viscosity before the main saccharification step. This preliminary structural modification makes the cellulose more accessible to cellulase enzymes in the second step, significantly improving the conversion rate without requiring complete process redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If high enzyme dosage is used to improve conversion, then sugar yield increases, but enzyme costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesugar yieldVSAvoidenzyme consumption cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The enzyme system is segmented into two specialized compositions with different functional focuses: endoglucanase-rich composition for structural breakdown and viscosity reduction, and cellulase-rich composition for sugar production. This segmentation allows each enzyme type to operate at optimal concentrations for its specific function, improving sugar yield while reducing overall enzyme consumption costs compared to using a single non-specific enzyme preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process optimizes enzyme dosage by changing the functional parameters of the enzyme compositions between the two steps. The first step uses endoglucanase with optimized activity for structural modification, while the second step uses cellulase with optimized activity for hydrolysis. This parameter optimization allows achieving high sugar yield with reduced total enzyme dosage by matching enzyme specificities to process requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If elevated temperature is used to increase reaction rate, then hydrolysis speed increases, but thermal inactivation of enzymes occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrolysis rateVSAvoidenzyme stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments the temperature profile into two distinct phases: the liquefaction step operates at elevated temperature (45-50°C) to maximize endoglucanase activity and viscosity reduction, while the saccharification step uses lower temperature to preserve cellulase stability and activity. This temporal segmentation of temperature conditions allows achieving high hydrolysis rate in the first step while maintaining enzyme reliability in the second step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process dynamically adjusts temperature conditions based on the specific enzymatic requirements of each step. The temperature is raised for the liquefaction step to enhance reaction rate and lowered for the saccharification step to protect enzyme stability. This dynamic temperature control optimizes both hydrolysis rate and enzyme reliability by matching thermal conditions to the specific functional needs of each enzymatic phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If prolonged hydrolysis time is used to improve conversion, then sugar yield increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion completenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrolysis process is segmented into two time-ordered steps with different objectives: the first liquefaction step focuses on structural breakdown and viscosity reduction with optimized time for maximum structural modification, while the second saccharification step focuses on sugar production with optimized time for maximum conversion. This segmentation allows achieving complete conversion in the minimum total time by optimizing the duration of each step for its specific function, thereby reducing overall energy consumption compared to a single prolonged step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The liquefaction step performs preliminary structural modification of cellulose that significantly enhances its accessibility and reactivity in the subsequent saccharification step. This preliminary action reduces the time required for complete sugar production in the second step, allowing the overall process to achieve high conversion completeness in shorter total time, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the conversion of cellulose to reducing sugars, reducing operational costs, energy consumption, and enzyme usage while maintaining high production levels of sugars and ethanol.

Implementation Method 1

a liquefaction step in which a first enzyme or first enzyme composition is added to liquefy at least part of the solids present in the biomass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

to reduce viscosity and to keep the viscosity of the cellulose containing biomass below 1000 cP

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity reduction:

Implementation Method 3

a saccharification step in which a second enzyme composition is added to form oligomeric and/or monomeric sugars

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 4

to form oligomeric and/or monomeric sugars

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSugar formation:

Implementation Method 5

using thermostable enzymes to optimize temperature and enzyme dosage for higher sugar yields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermostability:

Data Source

PatentUS10858682B2Process for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic material
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 VERSALIS SPA
  • US10858682B2 patent drawing
  • US10858682B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for the hydrolysis of cellulose containing biomass which comprisesa liquefaction step in which a first enzyme or first enzyme composition is added to liquefy at least part of the solids present in the biomass and to keep the viscosity of the cellulose containing biomass below 1000 cP, preferably below 800 cP, more preferably below 600 cP in the liquefaction step; followed bya saccharification step in which a second enzyme composition is added to form oligomeric and/or monomeric sugars; andwhereby the first enzyme or first enzyme composition is different from the second enzyme composition;whereby the first enzyme or first enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase;whereby the second enzyme composition comprises a cellulase; andwhereby the first enzyme or first enzyme composition comprises more endoglucanase than the second enzyme composition (expressed in protein wt %).