Two-Step Twist Drill Bit for Composite Delamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drilling composite materials, particularly through-hole drilling, is challenging due to delamination, tool wear, and achieving accurate geometry and surface finish, as the materials' heterogeneous structure and abrasive reinforcement cause issues with conventional twist drill bits.

Innovation Solution

A twist drill bit with a two-step blade design, where the initial step removes 70% of the material with a smaller point angle and diameter, and the finish step removes the remaining material with a slight layer and a smaller point angle, reducing axial forces and improving force distribution, thereby minimizing delamination and enhancing hole quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a conventional twist drill bit is used for drilling composite materials, then the drilling operation can be performed with standard equipment, but delamination occurs at the exit zone and tool wear increases due to abrasive reinforcement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling operationVSAvoidhole quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The drill bit blade is divided into two distinct steps: an initial step with a smaller diameter and point angle for removing the majority of material, and a finish step with a larger diameter for removing the remaining layer. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized for its specific function, reducing delamination while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the drill bit blade are given different geometric properties. The initial step has a smaller diameter and point angle (60°-90°) suited for rough material removal, while the finish step has a larger diameter and optimized point angle for precise finishing. This local differentiation addresses both material removal efficiency and hole quality requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If a twist drill bit with standard geometry is used, then the drilling process is simple, but axial forces are high causing delamination and tool wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling processVSAvoidaxial force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The drilling process is segmented into two stages corresponding to the two steps on the blade. The initial step removes 70% of material with reduced axial force due to its smaller diameter and point angle geometry. The finish step removes the remaining 30% with optimized force distribution. This segmentation significantly reduces peak axial forces that cause delamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drill bit geometry parameters are changed along the blade length. The point angle varies from 60°-90° on the initial step to optimized angles on the finish step. The diameter increases from the initial step to the finish step. These parameter changes enable better force distribution while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a single-step drill bit is used for through-hole drilling, then the process is efficient, but delamination and surface finish quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidsurface finish
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into two functional zones that work sequentially during drilling. The initial step handles the bulk material removal for efficiency, while the finish step provides the precise finishing for surface quality. This segmentation maintains productivity while eliminating delamination and improving surface finish

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two steps on the blade work continuously and sequentially during the drilling operation. As the drill advances, the initial step continuously removes material until the finish step takes over for the final layer. This continuous action ensures both efficiency and quality throughout the entire drilling process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The two-step design effectively reduces delamination, improves hole smoothness, dimensional accuracy, and shape accuracy, and reduces tool wear by distributing machining forces radially, making it suitable for drilling large-size composite components.

Implementation Method 1

The first one is removed in the initial stage where 70% of the material is removed, thus reducing the axial force resulting from a little point angle of the stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCutting action: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The other part involves retaining a slight layer, less than 1 mm, of the material placed circumferentially around the hole axis, where the finish step is also characterized by a little point angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCutting action: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP2981385B1Twist drill bit for drilling composite materials
Publication Date: 2017.08.02 POLITECHNIKA RZESZOWSKA IM IGNACEGO LUKASIEWICZA
  • EP2981385B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Twist drill bit for drilling composite materials, especially through-hole drilling, wherein the blade (3) formed at the upper part of the drill bit has two steps—the initial (4) and the finish one (5), wherein the length (lw) of the cylindrical part of the initial step (4) is at least 0.5 mm, and its first diameter (dW) is shorter than the second diameter (dp) of the finish step (5) by 0.5-2 mm, whereas the point angles (α and β) of the initial step (4) and finish step (5) range from 60° to 90°.