Two-Stroke Muffler Inertia Chamber Back Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mufflers for two-stroke engines in power tools face challenges in maintaining effective back pressure with small geometric dimensions, which can lead to unburned fuel-air mixture being released into the environment, affecting exhaust gas values and fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

A muffler design with a reduced total length, utilizing a first chamber to form temporary overpressure and flow back through the flow channel, maintaining a gas barrier at the outlet, achieved by optimizing the volume and geometric design of the flow channel and first chamber, allowing for smaller structural dimensions while maintaining effective back pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the muffler is designed with small geometric dimensions to suit hand-held power tools, then the device becomes more compact and portable, but the back pressure effect is reduced leading to harmful after-release of unburned fuel-air mixture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuffler volumeVSAvoidunburned fuel-air mixture release
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The muffler is segmented into distinct functional zones: a first chamber for initial exhaust gas reception and overpressure formation, and a second chamber for final exhaust release. The flow channel connecting these chambers is specifically designed to guide exhaust gas flow and maintain back pressure. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function efficiently within a compact overall volume, solving the contradiction between small size and effective back pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the flow channel is streamlined to guide exhaust gas into the first chamber using mass inertia, then the back pressure effect is improved, but the channel length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback pressure effectVSAvoidflow channel length
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The flow channel utilizes three-dimensional spatial arrangement to achieve streamlined flow guidance within a compact length. By designing the channel with specific geometric features and orientation in multiple dimensions, the exhaust gas is effectively directed into the first chamber using mass inertia without requiring excessive channel length. The channel's spatial configuration optimizes flow direction while maintaining compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If a resonance tube is added to create periodic pressure waves for back pressure, then the back pressure effect is improved, but the device complexity and length increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback pressure effectVSAvoidmuffler structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and utilizes the natural periodic pressure waves that are inherently generated by the two-stroke engine's operating cycle. Instead of adding a separate resonance tube to create pressure waves, the design relies on the engine's own cyclic operation to generate the necessary pressure fluctuations. The streamlined flow channel and chamber geometry are designed to amplify and utilize these naturally occurring pressure waves, thereby achieving back pressure without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enables smaller muffler dimensions while maintaining effective back pressure, improving exhaust gas values and reducing noise, suitable for hand-held power tools like chain saws and circular saws, with the total length reduced to 1/8 to 1/3 of the calculated length, and further reduced at higher engine speeds.

Implementation Method 1

the flow channel between the muffler inlet and the first chamber flow-favourably g is shaped in such a way that the exhaust gas flowing into the muffler inlet mainly flows into the first chamber due to its mass inertia and flows back again after the first chamber has been filled, and as a result a back pressure forms in the direction of the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass inertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP2497918B1Acoustic muffler for a two-cycle motor of a motorised work device
Publication Date: 2017.08.02 MAKITA CORP
  • EP2497918B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2497918B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2497918B1 patent drawing

AI summary

To provide a silencer (100) for a two-stroke engine (10) of a motorized work device, in particular for a hand-operated motorized work device such as a garden and landscaping equipment, a hand tool such as a chainsaw, a circular saw or an angle grinder, or for a moped, a boat engine and the like, wherein - the silencer has a silencer inlet (11) to which a flow channel (12) of channel length (I) is connected, such that - the flow channel (12) can be connected to an outlet of a combustion chamber (13) of the two-stroke engine (10) by means of the silencer inlet (11), - wherein the flow channel (12) opens into a first chamber (15) of depth (t) at the channel end (14) opposite the silencer inlet (11), the flow channel (12) between the silencer inlet (11) and the first chamber (15) is shaped in such a flow-optimized manner,The exhaust gas flowing into the silencer inlet (11) flows predominantly into the first chamber (15) due to its inertia and, after the first chamber (15) is filled, flows back again, thereby creating a back pressure towards the combustion chamber (13). It is proposed that the total length (Ltotal) of the channel length (I) and the depth (t) be smaller than the calculated length (L) according to: L = cs ⋅ ϕ12 ⋅ n in meters, where cs = speed of sound of the hot exhaust gas (m/s), ϕ = crank angle in degrees from opening the outlet to closing the transfer channel, and n = rotational speed in l/min.