Two-Way Clutch Layout With Overlapping Engaging Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional two-way clutches are bulky in the axial direction due to the axial arrangement of engaging elements, which limits their compactness.

Innovation Solution

The design includes overlapping engaging elements in the axial direction, with swingable retainers allowing the first and second engaging elements to engage and disengage with cam surfaces, reducing the axial size by allowing partial overlap in a side view orthogonal to the axial direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the first engaging element and the second engaging element are axially arranged in two rows, then the engaging elements can lock rotation in both directions, but the two-way clutch becomes large in the axial direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking capability in both directionsVSAvoidaxial size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a conventional axial arrangement of engaging elements to an overlapping arrangement where the first and second engaging elements are positioned to overlap in the axial direction when viewed from the side. This dimensional reconfiguration allows both engaging elements to occupy the same axial space rather than requiring sequential axial positioning, thereby reducing the overall axial size of the two-way clutch while maintaining the ability to lock rotation in both directions through the separate first and second retainers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the first retainer and the second retainer are separate components, then each engaging element can be independently controlled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent control of engaging elementsVSAvoidnumber of retainer components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the control functions of the first and second retainers into a single integrated retainer component. This merged retainer structure simultaneously controls both the first engaging element and the second engaging element, eliminating the need for separate first and second retainers. The integration reduces the number of components and simplifies the device structure while preserving the independent control capability through the retainer's ability to selectively engage or disengage either or both engaging elements as needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11761497B2Two-way clutch
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 SUGATSUNE IND CO LTD
  • US11761497B2 patent drawing
  • US11761497B2 patent drawing
  • US11761497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a two-way clutch capable of making a size in an axial direction thereof compact. A first engaging element and a second engaging element are arranged in a first wedge-shaped space and a second wedge-shaped space between an outer member and an inner member. The first engaging element is held by the first retainer and the first retainer is enabled to swing to the outer member. The second engaging element is held by the second retainer and the second retainer is enabled to swing to the outer member. In a side view orthogonal to an axial direction of the first engaging element and the second engaging element, at least a part of the first engaging element and at least a part of the second engaging element overlap in the axial direction.