Expanded Spinal Fusion Cage With Synchronous Two-Way Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal implants with telescopic rod and ring mechanisms provide limited adjustable elongation, leading to reduced support stability and ineffective bone fusion due to significant size differences after expansion, and increased volume, complicating packaging and transportation.

Innovation Solution

A spinal fusion cage designed for synchronous expansion in two directions using a sliding block set with a middle sliding block and outer sliding blocks, facilitated by a screw rod, allowing equal division of elongation and reduced component size differences, with curved surface elements and vertebral arch screws for enhanced stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional telescopic rod and ring mechanism is used for spinal implant expansion, then the implant can be adjusted in length, but the adjustable elongation is limited and the volume before expansion becomes larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustable elongationVSAvoidvolume before expansion
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies nesting by placing the middle sliding block inside the outer frame, and the outer sliding blocks inside the outer frame as well. The curved surface elements are nested within the structure before deployment. This nested configuration allows the implant to occupy minimal volume during storage and transport while enabling significant expansion during surgery, directly resolving the contradiction between adaptability and pre-expansion volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional telescopic expansion (conventional rod mechanism) to two-dimensional expansion by introducing the middle sliding block that simultaneously moves two outer sliding blocks in opposite directions along the outer frame. This dimensional change enables greater adjustable elongation without proportionally increasing the pre-expansion volume, as the expansion occurs along multiple axes rather than a single linear path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If a conventional telescopic mechanism with large diameter rod is used, then the implant can provide structural support, but the size difference between expansion components is great, reducing bone fusion effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsize difference between components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the expansion mechanism into three comparable-sized components: the outer frame, the middle sliding block, and the two outer sliding blocks. Each component has a similar diameter and occupies a comparable spatial footprint, eliminating the large size difference between the rod and main body in conventional designs. This segmentation maintains structural support through the distributed framework while enabling effective bone fusion by providing uniform surfaces for bone contact across all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by designing each sliding block and frame section with specific functional surfaces optimized for their local role. The outer frame provides structural support with its rigid framework, while the sliding blocks provide smooth expansion surfaces. The curved surface elements provide localized contact areas for vertebral body engagement. This distribution of specialized qualities across comparably-sized components maintains overall strength while enabling effective bone fusion at each local interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional single-direction telescopic mechanism is used, then the implant can be adjusted, but the support stability of vertebral bodies is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelength adjustmentVSAvoidsupport stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the expansion mechanism by having the middle sliding block differentially engage the two outer sliding blocks. The middle sliding block has asymmetric features that allow it to push the outer sliding blocks apart while maintaining differential adjustment capability. This asymmetric design enables length adjustment while the curved surface elements and vertebral arch screws provide symmetric stabilization, achieving both adaptability and support stability through complementary asymmetric and symmetric features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the outer frame with guide rails and the sliding blocks with matching engagement features before the expansion operation. The curved surface elements are pre-positioned to engage the vertebral bodies, and the vertebral arch screws are pre-configured for stabilization. This preliminary preparation ensures that when expansion occurs, the components immediately provide stable support rather than requiring post-expansion adjustment, thus maintaining both adaptability and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances adjustable elongation, improves support stability, facilitates easier operation, and promotes effective bone fusion, while reducing pre-expansion volume for improved packaging and transportation.

Implementation Method 1

a screw rod penetrating through and combined with the outer frame, wherein the screw rod is screwed with the middle sliding block, such that the middle sliding block is moved in translation in the outer frame and simultaneously expands the two outer sliding blocks by rotating the screw rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS12453642B2Expanded spinal fusion cage
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 NAT YANG MING CHIAO TUNG UNIV
  • US12453642B2 patent drawing
  • US12453642B2 patent drawing
  • US12453642B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expanded spinal fusion cage is provided and includes: an outer frame; a sliding block set with a middle sliding block located within the outer frame, and the middle sliding block is located between two outer sliding blocks; a screw rod penetrating through and combined with the outer frame, and the screw rod is screwed with the middle sliding block, so that the middle sliding block is moved in translation in the outer frame and simultaneously expands the two outer sliding blocks by rotating the screw rod; two curved surface elements located outside the outer frame and combined with the two outer sliding blocks respectively, each of the curved surface elements has a wing plate; and two vertebral arch screws penetrating through and combined with the two wing plates.