Two-Zone Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit for Propylene Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fluid catalytic cracking systems face challenges in simultaneously producing gasoline and propylene while minimizing undesirable side reactions that reduce the yield of desired products like propylene.

Innovation Solution

The system employs two reaction zones with different volumes, where the first zone is adapted for a high-temperature hydrocarbon feed with a catalyst mixture to produce gasoline, and the second zone, with a smaller volume, is optimized for producing propylene using C4-C6 olefins, with a disengagement zone to isolate products and minimize side reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single reaction zone is used for fluid catalytic cracking, then the system complexity is reduced, but the ability to simultaneously produce gasoline and propylene while minimizing side reactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsimultaneous production capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cracking system is divided into two separate reaction zones: a first reaction zone optimized for gasoline production from heavy hydrocarbon feeds, and a second reaction zone optimized for propylene production from C4-C6 olefins. Each zone has tailored operating conditions (temperature, residence time, catalyst type) to maximize selectivity for its target product while minimizing unwanted side reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each reaction zone is designed with local optimizations specific to its function: the first zone uses conditions suitable for gasoline formation, while the second zone uses conditions optimized for propylene selectivity. The disengagement zone provides localized product separation before the streams are combined, ensuring each product develops under its optimal conditions without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If products are allowed to mix in the presence of catalyst, then the system operation is simplified, but undesirable side reactions increase reducing propylene yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidpropylene yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A disengagement zone is introduced between the two reaction zones where the product stream from the first zone is separated from the catalyst before entering the second zone. This extraction of the product stream prevents it from undergoing unwanted catalytic reactions in the second zone, thereby preserving propylene yield while maintaining operational simplicity through a straightforward sequential arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If reaction zone volume is increased to handle larger feeds, then processing capacity is improved, but propylene production efficiency deteriorates due to extended residence time causing side reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidpropylene production efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The total processing capacity is segmented across two zones with different volume characteristics. The first zone handles the bulk heavy feed conversion to gasoline with larger volume capacity, while the second zone processes the C4-C6 olefin stream to propylene with optimized smaller volume to maintain short residence time and high propylene selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the simultaneous production of gasoline and propylene while reducing undesirable side reactions, thereby enhancing the yield of propylene and maintaining product isolation in the presence of catalysts.

Implementation Method 1

fluid catalytic cracking can convert heavy hydrocarbons into light hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

the disengagement zone can be for receiving a first mixture including at least one catalyst and one or more products from the first reaction vessel, and a second mixture including at least one catalyst and one or more products from the second reaction vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS8394259B2Unit, system and process for catalytic cracking
Publication Date: 2013.03.12 UOP LLC
  • US8394259B2 patent drawing
  • US8394259B2 patent drawing
  • US8394259B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One exemplary embodiment can be a fluid catalytic cracking unit. The fluid catalytic cracking unit can include a first riser, a second riser, and a disengagement zone. The first riser can be adapted to receive a first feed terminating at a first reaction vessel having a first volume. The second riser may be adapted to receive a second feed terminating at a second reaction vessel having a second volume. Generally, the first volume is greater than the second volume. What is more, the disengagement zone can be for receiving a first mixture including at least one catalyst and one or more products from the first reaction vessel, and a second mixture including at least one catalyst and one or more products from the second reaction vessel. Typically, the first mixture is isolated from the second mixture.