Two-Stage PDCCH with DCI Flag for Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, the processing overhead increases as the length of a transmission time interval (TTI) is shortened, leading to inefficiencies in transmitting control information, particularly in LTE systems where a fixed TTI length of one millisecond corresponds to one subframe, resulting in increased latency and decoding complexity for user equipment (UEs).

Innovation Solution

Implementing a two-stage physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) structure, where the payload is split into a 'fast' PDCCH and a 'slow' PDCCH portion, with the fast PDCCH indicating the presence and size of the slow PDCCH portion, allowing for reduced processing overhead and efficient data transmission by reusing slow PDCCH information across multiple TTIs and minimizing blind decodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the length of TTI is shortened to reduce latency, then the response time is improved, but the processing overhead for UE to decode control information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control information payload is segmented into two distinct parts: a first payload transmitted in every TTI containing essential control information, and a second payload transmitted less frequently containing additional control information. This segmentation allows UEs to decode only the first payload in each TTI, significantly reducing processing overhead while maintaining low latency through frequent transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first payload is transmitted in advance in every TTI containing critical control information that UEs need immediately. This preliminary transmission ensures that essential control data is available before the TTI ends, reducing the need for complex post-decoding processing and minimizing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If control information is transmitted in every TTI to reduce latency, then the response time is improved, but the processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Control information is divided into a first payload (transmitted every TTI) and a second payload (transmitted less frequently). This segmentation enables fast response times by ensuring critical information is always available in every TTI, while reducing processing overhead by transmitting comprehensive information less frequently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first payload is transmitted continuously in every TTI to maintain uninterrupted control information flow, ensuring fast response times. Meanwhile, the second payload supplements this continuous transmission periodically, providing complete control information without requiring full payload transmission every TTI.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Quantity of substance

If the PDCCH payload size is increased to include more control information, then the control channel capacity is improved, but the decoding complexity for UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol information volumeVSAvoiddecoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PDCCH payload is segmented into a first payload containing essential control information and a second payload containing additional control information. UEs only need to decode the first payload in every TTI, reducing decoding complexity, while the second payload is decoded less frequently to provide complete control information, effectively increasing control channel capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of transmitting the complete control information payload in every TTI, only the essential first payload is transmitted frequently. The complete control information is provided by combining the first payload with the second payload transmitted less frequently, reducing decoding complexity while maintaining adequate control information volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If blind decoding is performed for every TTI to ensure reliable control information reception, then the reliability is improved, but the number of false alarms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol information reception reliabilityVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Blind decoding is applied selectively to the first payload in every TTI rather than to the complete control information payload. This segmentation reduces the number of blind decoding attempts and associated false alarms, while the reliability is maintained by consistently receiving the essential first payload that contains critical control information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3213446B1Two-stage pdcch with DCI flag and DCI format size indicator
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3213446B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3213446B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3213446B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices are described for wireless communication employing two-stage control channel messaging. Systems, methods, and apparatuses for two stage two-stage physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) with a downlink control information (DCI) flag and DCI format size indicator are described. For instance, the present disclosure presents an example method of wireless communication at a wireless device, which may include receiving, at a first bandwidth and during a transmission time interval (TTI), a first control channel message. In addition, the example method may include determining, based on a flag in the first control channel message, whether a second control channel message is present in the TTI. Furthermore, the example method may include receiving, at a second bandwidth, the second control channel message where the flag indicates that the second control channel message is present for the TTI.