Type II Semiconductor Contact Security Ink

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Security documents with fluorescent features are vulnerable to forgery due to ease of production and detection, lacking sufficient security against unauthorized reproduction and detection.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a type II semiconductor contact system with specific semiconductor layers and a separating layer to create a luminescent security feature with a tailored decay time, which can be verified using instruments, providing an additional hidden security layer that is not visible to the naked eye.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If fluorescent paints or inks are used to produce security features, then production is easy and economic, but security against forgery is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of productionVSAvoidsecurity against forgery
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the luminescent material from conventional fluorescent dyes to type II semiconductor contacts with specific decay times. This parameter change maintains ease of production through printing processes while significantly enhancing security against forgery due to the complex semiconductor structure that is difficult to replicate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite semiconductor structures (type II contacts) combining multiple semiconductor layers with specific band alignments. This composite approach creates a security feature that maintains production simplicity while providing enhanced anti-forgery properties through the complex material composition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If conventional fluorescent substances are used, then visual detection is simple, but instrumental verification capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual detection simplicityVSAvoidinstrumental verification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces decay time measurement as a feedback verification mechanism. By measuring the characteristic decay time of the semiconductor contact luminescence, verification instruments can confirm authenticity, adding an instrumental verification layer that complements simple visual detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the time dimension to luminescence verification through decay time measurement. While conventional fluorescent substances only provide spatial/color information, the semiconductor contacts provide temporal information through their characteristic decay times, enabling multi-parameter verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If type II semiconductor contact systems are used, then security against forgery is enhanced, but production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against forgeryVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates microscopic copies of the semiconductor contact structure within the printing ink. By embedding type II contact particles in the ink formulation, the complex semiconductor structure can be replicated through conventional printing processes, maintaining production simplicity while ensuring high security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If decay time measurement is added for verification, then detectability of forgeries is improved, but verification complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetectability of forgeriesVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the verification parameter from simple visual inspection to decay time measurement. This parameter change enables detection of forgeries through temporal characteristics of luminescence, providing enhanced detectability while keeping the verification process relatively simple through standardized measurement protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances security against forgery by adding a measurable decay time feature that is difficult for forgers to replicate, offering improved detectability through both visual observation and instrumental verification, while maintaining simplicity in production.

Implementation Method 1

Luminescent substances are such substances, which fluoresce or phosphoresce upon excitation with light having sufficient energy, for instance UV

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLuminescence: Luminescence

Implementation Method 2

The wavelengths or energies of the fluorescence or of the phosphorescence are specific for the respective substances, since they correspond to the difference of the energy levels of the two states, between which a relaxation from the excited state takes place

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS9399365B2Security and/or valuable document having a type II semiconductor contact system
Publication Date: 2016.07.26 BUNDESDRUCKEREI GMBH
  • US9399365B2 patent drawing
  • US9399365B2 patent drawing
  • US9399365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a security and/or value document having a security feature, to an ink for making the security feature, to a method for making such a security and/or value document, and to a method for verifying such a security and/or value document.