Typing Feedback from Sensor Information

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information handling devices lack effective solutions for real-time correction and long-term improvement of typing mechanics, as existing technologies only provide blind direction, mistake correction, or human intervention, failing to address mechanical errors and ergonomic issues.

Innovation Solution

The use of sensors, such as optical or IR sensors, to detect hand positions and key actuation mechanics, providing real-time feedback through haptic, audio, or visual cues to correct finger movements and train users in good typing habits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensors are used to detect hand positions and provide real-time feedback, then typing mechanics correction and ergonomics improvement are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetyping mechanics correctionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensors detect finger position and typing mechanics, the processor analyzes this data against expected patterns, and the system provides real-time feedback to the user. This closed-loop feedback system enables continuous correction and improvement of typing mechanics, directly resolving the technical contradiction by making typing correction reliable through systematic sensor-feedback-analyze-correct cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces software intermediaries including a sensor interface module, processor-based analysis engine, and feedback generation system that mediate between the physical sensors and the user. These software layers process raw sensor data, compare it with typing models, and translate it into actionable feedback, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining reliable typing correction functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time sensor feedback is provided to correct finger movements, then typing efficiency improves, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetyping efficiencyVSAvoidinformation processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively monitoring and providing feedback only for specific typing errors or ergonomic violations rather than analyzing every keystroke in detail. The system identifies and corrects only the most significant deviations from proper typing technique, reducing information processing requirements while maintaining typing efficiency improvements through targeted feedback on critical errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring of finger position is implemented, then typing habit training is enhanced, but user distraction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetyping habit trainingVSAvoiduser distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by providing feedback at strategically timed intervals rather than continuously. The system monitors finger position continuously but provides corrective feedback only when specific conditions are met, such as when a typing error occurs or after a sequence of correct inputs. This periodic feedback approach maintains effective typing habit training while minimizing user distraction by avoiding constant interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables real-time correction and long-term improvement of typing mechanics, enhancing user efficiency and ergonomics by providing personalized feedback without interrupting the workflow.

Implementation Method 1

The use of sensors, such as optical or IR sensors, to detect hand positions and key actuation mechanics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Light

Implementation Method 2

providing real-time feedback through haptic, audio, or visual cues to correct finger movements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaptic feedback: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS10928924B2Typing feedback derived from sensor information
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 LENOVO SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US10928924B2 patent drawing
  • US10928924B2 patent drawing
  • US10928924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment provides a method, including: operating a sensor of an information handling device to capture location information of a user; determining, using a processor to analyze the location information, a position of a finger of a user relative to a keyboard location; determining, using the processor, a difference between an expected location for the finger and the position of the finger of the user relative to the keyboard location; and offering, using the processor, feedback regarding the difference determined. Other aspects are described and claimed.