Automated Typographical Error Rectification via Linguistic Network Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for rectifying typographical errors in text data, such as those from surveys and social platforms, require manual intervention and are inefficient in handling colloquial or informal language, which often contains non-standard forms and abbreviations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that generates a linguistic network of words in a text file, computes similarity based on parameters like distance, phonetic similarity, and frequency, assigns weights to edges, categorizes words, identifies typographical errors, and substitutes them with reference words automatically, eliminating the need for manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated typographical error rectification systems are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rectification speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the error rectification process into distinct modules: network generation module creates a linguistic network from text, computation module calculates similarity metrics, weight assignment module prioritizes corrections, categorization module groups errors, word identification module detects typographical errors, and word substitution module applies corrections. This segmentation enables automated high-speed processing while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The linguistic network serves as an intermediary structure that represents word relationships in the text. By computing similarity between words and assigning weights to connections in this network, the system mediates between raw text input and corrected output, enabling automated error detection and correction without requiring complex direct analysis of every possible error type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual intervention is required for error correction, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoiduser intervention time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting typographical errors through the linguistic network analysis, computing similarity metrics, and applying corrections without requiring user intervention. The word identification module autonomously identifies errors and the word substitution module automatically replaces them, eliminating the time loss associated with manual review while maintaining precision through algorithmic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the computation module continuously evaluates similarity between words and the weight assignment module adjusts correction priorities based on network analysis results. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from patterns in the text and improve correction accuracy automatically, reducing reliance on manual intervention while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If linguistic network analysis is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources only on words that are likely to contain errors, rather than analyzing every word in the text with equal depth. The weight assignment module prioritizes certain word connections in the linguistic network, and the word identification module concentrates on high-probability error candidates, reducing overall computational energy while maintaining detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9734234B2System and method for rectifying a typographical error in a text file
Publication Date: 2017.08.15 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US9734234B2 patent drawing
  • US9734234B2 patent drawing
  • US9734234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system for rectifying a typographical error in a text file. The system includes a network generating module for generating a linguistic network of a plurality of words present in the text file. A computation module configured to compute the similarity between each pair of words based on a set of parameters. A weight assignment module for assigning a weight to the edge present between the each pair of words based the set of parameters. A categorization module configured to categorize one or more words present in the linguistic network in a category. A word identification module configured to identify a reference word from the category. A word substitution module configured to substitute each word of the category deemed as erroneous with corresponding reference word for rectifying the typographical error.