Tyre Tread with Low-Inclination Sipes and Chamfered Areas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tyre tread designs face challenges in achieving optimal performance across various driving conditions, particularly in braking, cornering, and handling, both in wet and dry conditions, for passenger vehicles, where a single design must excel in multiple scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The tyre tread features a sculptured external surface with sipes extending at low inclination angles (15-40 degrees) and chamfered areas, which enhance braking adherence and maintain stiffness, particularly by having larger chamfered regions at the outer sides and variable depth sipes to reduce tread involution during braking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If sipes are designed with traditional high inclination angles, then the tread structure maintains good stiffness, but braking adherence and traction performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking adherenceVSAvoidtread structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the inclination angle parameter of sipes from traditional high angles to low angles (specifically 15-40 degrees relative to the tread width direction), which fundamentally alters the sipe projection along the tread width direction and improves braking adherence while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different chamfering depths at different locations - larger chamfered areas at outer sides of land portions and smaller chamfered areas in central parts, creating local quality variations that simultaneously improve braking performance and maintain central stiffness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If chamfered areas are increased to reduce tread involution during braking, then braking performance improves, but tread stiffness in central regions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performanceVSAvoidtread stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements non-uniform chamfering where outer sides of land portions have larger chamfered areas for reduced involution and improved braking, while central parts maintain smaller chamfered areas to preserve tread stiffness and structural stability during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The chamfered areas are designed asymmetrically with respect to depth and distribution, being larger at outer boundaries and smaller in central regions, which optimizes both braking performance and structural rigidity through asymmetric geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Strength

If sipes extend at low inclination angles to improve braking adherence, then traction in wet conditions improves, but the edge-ingredient-effect increases causing potential instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction in wet conditionsVSAvoidtread stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the inclination angle parameter within a specific range (15-40 degrees) to balance two competing effects: low enough to increase sipe projection for better braking adherence and traction, but controlled to prevent excessive edge-ingredient-effect that could cause instability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The combination of low inclination angle sipes with location-dependent chamfering creates local quality variations that enhance traction where needed while maintaining stability in critical regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If variable depth sipes are used to reduce tread involution, then braking adherence improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking adherenceVSAvoidmold complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements variable depth sipes where the depth parameter changes along the sipe length, with different depths in different regions to reduce tread involution during braking while maintaining manufacturability through systematic depth variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The sipes are segmented into different depth zones along their length, creating a stepped or graduated depth structure that reduces involution while being manufacturable through segmented mold cavity design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10688833B2Tyre tread
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 BRIDGESTONE CORP
  • US10688833B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tyre tread (1) having a sculptured external surface including see-through sipes (71, 72, 73) at an intermediate land region (4), wherein each of such sipes extends according to a straight line defining a low inclination angle (α, β, γ) with respect to a tread width direction (W), such sipes being also surrounded by respective chamfered areas (81, 82, 83) (FIG. 1).