U-Shaped Bracket Anchoring for Concrete Wall Reinforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Structural elements such as concrete, masonry, and timber walls are prone to cracking, tilting, and bowing due to inherent weaknesses, particularly under lateral loads and water pressure, leading to potential structural collapse without effective reinforcement methods.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement system involving a fiber reinforcement strip adhered to a structural member with U-shaped brackets that include a bridge portion and legs, secured within holes in the member, providing a strong anchoring mechanism to inhibit deformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If carbon fiber material is adhered to structural elements to treat deformation, then structural strength is improved, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system is divided into discrete U-shaped brackets positioned at specific intervals along the structural element. Each bracket acts as an independent reinforcement unit with legs anchored in holes and a bridge portion spanning between them, creating segmented reinforcement zones that collectively strengthen the entire structure while maintaining manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple materials with complementary properties: U-shaped brackets (likely metal) provide structural rigidity and anchoring, fiber reinforcement strips provide tensile strength and flexibility, and adhesive material bonds these components together. This composite approach achieves superior structural reinforcement compared to single-material solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If carbon fiber material is adhered to structural elements to treat deformation, then structural strength is improved, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The U-shaped brackets appear to be relatively simple, inexpensive components that can be mass-produced using standard manufacturing processes. Rather than using expensive continuous carbon fiber reinforcement throughout the entire structure, the system employs discrete, affordable brackets at strategic locations, achieving effective reinforcement at lower cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the reinforcement into discrete brackets rather than using continuous expensive materials along the entire structural element, the system reduces overall material costs while maintaining effectiveness at critical reinforcement zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If U-shaped brackets with widened bridge portion are used, then anchoring strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchoring strengthVSAvoidbracket complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bridge portion of the U-shaped bracket is widened only at the specific location where it contacts the fiber reinforcement strip and structural element, rather than making the entire bracket uniformly complex. This localized geometric modification concentrates the strength enhancement exactly where needed for anchoring, while keeping the rest of the bracket design simple and easy to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents or inhibits deformation of structural elements by providing a strong anchoring mechanism, thereby enhancing the structural integrity and preventing collapse.

Implementation Method 1

A fiber reinforcement strip is adhered to the structural member between the pair of holes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

A U-shaped bracket includes a pair of legs being secured within the pair of holes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical anchoring: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS9290957B1Structure reinforcement system and method
Publication Date: 2016.03.22 FORTRESS STABILIZATION SYST
  • US9290957B1 patent drawing
  • US9290957B1 patent drawing
  • US9290957B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A reinforcement system includes a structural member such as a concrete wall including a pair of holes formed therein. A fiber reinforcement strip is adhered to the structural member between the pair of holes. A U-shaped bracket includes a pair of legs being secured in the pair of holes and a bridge portion that overlaps the fiber reinforcement strip, wherein the first end of the fiber reinforcement strip is wrapped around the bridge portion and adhered to an intermediate portion of the fiber reinforcement strip.