U-Shaped Card Rack Structure for Dense Board Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Card rack systems in the electronics industry face challenges such as inaccessible key components for installation, maintenance, and repair due to stacked card configurations, high costs, and labor-intensive assembly processes, while alternative methods often waste space and are expensive.

Innovation Solution

A card rack system designed as a single, inexpensive structure made from non-conducting materials that can be stamped out for mass production, featuring a snap-fit or press-fit locking mechanism, allowing for easy installation and providing access to a high percentage of each card's surface area while optimizing space usage, with adjustable mounting angles and secure hooks for various personnel and board sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If traditional card rack systems are used to support cards in close proximity, then space utilization is improved, but accessibility to key components deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidaccessibility to key components
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rack structure is segmented into multiple levels or tiers that stagger the card positions, allowing components on different cards to be accessible from different directions. This segmentation maintains close proximity of cards while creating accessible zones for installation and maintenance personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rack system transitions from a single-plane card arrangement to a multi-dimensional configuration where cards are positioned at different heights and angles. This dimensional change allows components to be accessed from multiple directions simultaneously, resolving the conflict between compact spacing and component accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If traditional card rack systems are used, then card support functionality is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecard support functionalityVSAvoidmulti-component assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate components (card holders, mounting brackets, fasteners) are merged into a single integrated rack structure. This consolidation maintains reliable card support functionality while eliminating the complexity of assembling multiple discrete parts, directly addressing the contradiction between reliability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rack structure is designed as a universal platform that performs multiple functions: supporting cards, providing mechanical stability, enabling accessibility, and facilitating installation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining support reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional card rack systems are installed in enclosures, then card mounting capability is improved, but assembly labor intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecard mounting capabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Cards are pre-positioned or pre-configured on the rack structure during manufacturing, so that during installation only the rack itself needs to be mounted in the enclosure. This preliminary action significantly reduces assembly time while maintaining the adaptability of the card mounting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The rack structure incorporates self-aligning or self-locking features that automatically position and secure cards during installation without requiring complex fastening operations. This self-service mechanism reduces assembly labor intensity while preserving full card mounting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If other card mounting methods are used to provide easy access, then accessibility is improved, but space utilization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility for installation and maintenanceVSAvoidenclosure space requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rack structure incorporates adjustable or movable elements that allow the configuration to be optimized for both accessibility and space utilization. This dynamic adaptability enables the system to provide easy access to components while maintaining efficient use of enclosure space, resolving the contradiction between accessibility and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8684191B2Card rack system
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 RESIDEO LLC
  • US8684191B2 patent drawing
  • US8684191B2 patent drawing
  • US8684191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support rack for a substantially planar circuit board includes first and second spaced apart sides. The sides define a plurality of spaced apart product receiving support surfaces where corresponding surfaces on each side are parallel to one another and spaced apart by a central region to form a U-shaped rack. Between pairs of support surfaces on a selected side are truncated, trapezoidal-like protrusions which terminate in product retaining clips. Integrally formed braces can be provided to increase rack strength.