U-Shaped Connector Reinforcement for Hollow Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing U-shaped connectors for hollow profiles face challenges in fully automatic processing, particularly with shearing forces, leading to potential breakage or dislodgment, which can allow desiccant to enter the insulating glass panes, and fail to adapt to varying profile tolerances.

Innovation Solution

The connector features a reinforcement in its middle region with a tapered design, including a material thickening and crowned waist, which enhances mechanical insertion and shearing stability while allowing self-adaptation to different profiles, and includes stops and beveled side bars for secure fitting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the connector is designed with standard strength, then it can be easily inserted into hollow profiles, but it breaks or slips out under greater shearing forces during fully automatic processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshearing stabilityVSAvoidinsertion ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is divided into distinct functional zones: a reinforcement zone in the middle region with increased wall thickness for strength, and tapered side regions for easy insertion. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connector has non-uniform wall thickness with a local thickening in the middle region where shearing forces are highest, while the side regions maintain smaller thickness for ease of insertion. This local quality variation optimizes both strength and operability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If the connector has uniform wall thickness, then it is simple to manufacture, but it cannot adapt to varying profile tolerances and may jam during insertion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance adaptationVSAvoidconnector geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall thickness parameter of the connector is varied along its length, with the middle region having greater thickness than the side regions. This parameter change enables the connector to adapt to tolerance variations in hollow profiles while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If reinforcement is added to the connector, then shearing stability improves, but the fit in hollow profile and passage of drying material may be impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshearing stabilityVSAvoidfit and desiccant flow
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement is localized to the middle region of the connector, separating the strengthening function from the insertion and desiccant flow functions that occur at the side regions. This spatial segmentation ensures that reinforcement does not interfere with profile fit or desiccant passage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connector has locally increased wall thickness only where needed for shearing stability, while maintaining appropriate clearance and fit characteristics in the side regions for proper insertion and desiccant flow through the hollow profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1983139B1U-shaped connector
Publication Date: 2016.05.04 CERA GMBH
  • EP1983139B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1983139B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Plastic U-shaped connector (1) comprises a reinforced part (11) in its central region. Preferred Features: The reinforced part is formed on the inner sides of side bars (3) and is formed as a thicker material. Stops (8) are provided on the outer sides (5) of the side bars.