U-Shaped Security System with Enlargement Restraint for Retail Electronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail electronic devices are often left unsecured due to the high cost of sophisticated security systems, making them attractive targets for theft, and existing less expensive mechanical systems are not economically feasible or practical.

Innovation Solution

A security system comprising a first subassembly that encircles an electronic device's wall portion, blocked by enlargements, and a second subassembly that either maintains the device within a controlled distance or generates a detectable alarm signal if the device is moved beyond a predetermined range or reconfigured, using a tether and connecting assembly to prevent unauthorized removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sophisticated electronic security systems are implemented, then security effectiveness is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system is divided into two functional subassemblies: a first subassembly that physically encircles and restrains the electronic device using enlargements on the wall portion, and a second subassembly that generates alarm signals. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and reduces overall system complexity and cost while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanical structure (the first subassembly with enlargements engaging the wall portion) that mediates between the device and the support surface. This intermediary provides reliable physical restraint without requiring complex electronic controls, thereby reducing system cost while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If mechanical security systems are used, then cost is reduced, but security effectiveness becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidsecurity effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges mechanical restraint (first subassembly with enlargements) and electronic alarm (second subassembly) into a single integrated security system. The mechanical portion provides reliable physical confinement at low cost, while the electronic alarm component adds security effectiveness. This combination resolves the contradiction by achieving both affordability and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The first subassembly serves multiple functions: it physically encircles the device, prevents removal through the support surface, and provides a mounting structure for the alarm system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, lowering overall system cost while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the device is left unsecured on display, then accessibility for inspection is improved, but theft risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidtheft risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The security system allows dynamic interaction: customers can freely inspect and operate devices on display, but the first subassembly with enlargements provides dynamic restraint that prevents removal. The system adapts to legitimate use while blocking theft attempts, thus maintaining accessibility while reducing theft risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The enlargements on the wall portion, which could be seen as adding complexity to the device structure, are converted into a security feature. These structural elements serve the dual purpose of device construction and security restraint, transforming a potential harm (added complexity) into a benefit (theft prevention) without compromising accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS10273722B2Security system for electronic device
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 SE KURE CONTROLS INC
  • US10273722B2 patent drawing
  • US10273722B2 patent drawing
  • US10273722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The combination of: a) an electronic device having a wall portion with first and second ends and at least one enlargement on each of opposite sides of the wall portion; and b) a security system. The security system is made up of an elongate body, with third and fourth ends, and a connecting assembly. The body has first and second legs and a base joined together to cooperatively define a "U" shape. The connecting assembly and the body are configured so that with the security system operatively positioned, the first and second legs, base, and connecting assembly cooperatively encircle the elongate wall portion and the body is confined between at least first and second of the enlargements on the opposite sides of the elongate wall portion. In one form, a tether is secured to the connecting assembly and to a fixed support.