UAS Control Circuit No-Fly Zone Detection and Path Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In modern retail environments, existing delivery methods face delays and increased costs due to the challenge of navigating unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) around no-fly zones, which are not always predefined or known, potentially leading to unauthorized flight paths and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a UAS control system that includes a control circuit capable of detecting no-fly zones using sensors and beacon detection, allowing for real-time adjustment of flight paths to avoid these zones and ensuring safe delivery by obtaining a revised flight path with a detour route, and initiating package delivery when reaching a threshold distance from the intended location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If UAS follows a direct flight path to delivery location, then delivery speed is improved, but UAS may fly into no-fly zones causing safety issues and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery speedVSAvoidflight safety
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of no-fly zones using sensors and beacon detectors before the UAS commits to a flight path. The control circuit identifies no-fly zones and calculates detour routes in advance, allowing the UAS to maintain efficient delivery speeds while proactively avoiding restricted areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit continuously monitors sensor data and beacon signals during flight, providing real-time feedback about no-fly zone proximity. When a no-fly zone is detected, the system automatically adjusts the flight path by calculating and implementing detour routes, ensuring safety while minimizing delivery time impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If UAS detects and avoids no-fly zones in real-time, then flight safety is improved, but delivery time increases due to detour routes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit identifies no-fly zones and pre-calculates optimal detour routes before the UAS needs to execute them. By performing this path planning in advance based on sensor data and beacon signals, the system minimizes the time lost during actual delivery operations while ensuring safety compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The flight path is made dynamic and adaptive rather than static. The control circuit continuously monitors the environment for no-fly zones and automatically adjusts the route in real-time. This dynamic approach allows the UAS to take efficient detours only when necessary and return to the optimal delivery path as quickly as possible, minimizing overall delivery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If UAS uses sensors and beacon detectors to detect no-fly zones, then flight safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit serves multiple functions: it processes sensor data, detects beacon signals, identifies no-fly zones, calculates detour routes, and controls UAS navigation. By making the control circuit multi-functional rather than adding separate dedicated systems for each function, the patent improves flight safety while minimizing the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges sensor data processing and beacon detection into a unified control circuit architecture. Rather than having separate independent systems for sensing, detection, and navigation, these functions are integrated into a single control circuit that efficiently handles all tasks, reducing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive no-fly zone avoidance capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10269255B2Unmanned aircraft systems and methods
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US10269255B2 patent drawing
  • US10269255B2 patent drawing
  • US10269255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments provide a system to identify geographic zones into which unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are inhibited from flying. In some instances, the system detects, while the UAS is in flight and traveling along a flight path to a delivery location where the UAS is scheduled to deliver a package, a no fly zone (NFZ) into which the UAS is to avoid flying; obtains a revised flight path to the delivery location that includes a detour route around the no fly zone; directs the motor controller to control the motors to implement the revised flight path; and detects when the UAS is at a threshold distance from the delivery location and initiate delivery of the package.