UAS Surveillance Coverage Correction for BVLOS Flight Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operating unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) requires continuous surveillance to prevent collisions and ensure deconfliction from other aircraft, but existing systems cannot prevent inadvertent departure from surveillance coverage during flight, leading to potential collisions or incursions.

Innovation Solution

An unmanned aerial system (UAS) with a controller that acquires surveillance quality models for a flight path, compares actual data to these models, and directs the UAV to execute corrective maneuvers, such as changing position or heading, if deviations exceed a threshold, to maintain surveillance coverage and avoid collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If extensive preplanning is performed for BVLOS operations, then surveillance coverage can be accounted for, but real-time prevention of surveillance loss is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreflight planning timeVSAvoidreal-time surveillance coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preflight surveillance coverage analysis by comparing the planned flight path against surveillance coverage areas to identify potential gaps before the flight occurs. This preliminary action allows the system to predict where surveillance coverage may be lost and pre-compute corrective maneuvers to maintain continuous surveillance coverage throughout the flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static preflight planning to dynamic real-time adjustment by continuously monitoring actual surveillance coverage during flight and automatically generating corrective maneuvers when deviations are detected, making the surveillance coverage maintenance adaptive and responsive to actual flight conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If BVLOS operations are conducted without continuous surveillance correction, then operational flexibility is maintained, but collision risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBVLOS operational flexibilityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the UAV to autonomously maintain its own surveillance coverage by automatically detecting coverage deviations and executing corrective maneuvers without requiring continuous human intervention. This self-service capability allows BVLOS operations to proceed with enhanced safety while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by pre-computing corrective maneuvers during preflight planning that counteract potential surveillance coverage losses before they occur. During flight, the system continues this protective action by detecting and correcting coverage deviations, thereby preventing collision risks before they materialize.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11345473B1System and method for preventing inadvertent loss of surveillance coverage for an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US11345473B1 patent drawing
  • US11345473B1 patent drawing
  • US11345473B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned aerial system (UAS) is disclosed. In embodiments, the UAS includes an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and a controller communicatively coupled to the UAV. In embodiments, the UAS controller may be configured to: acquire a surveillance quality model for a prescribed flight path; generate one or more control signals configured to cause the UAV to perform a monitored flight along the prescribed flight path; acquire actual surveillance quality data during the monitored flight along the prescribed flight path; compare the actual surveillance quality data to the surveillance quality model; identify a surveillance quality deviation between the actual surveillance quality and the surveillance quality model; and generate one or more control signals configured to cause the UAV to perform one or more corrective actions or maneuvers if the identified surveillance quality deviation exceeds a threshold deviation value.