Autonomous UAV Target Tracking via Adaptive Sensor Orientation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human operators must closely monitor imagery from UAVs to maintain a moving target within the sensor's field of view, which is inefficient and prone to errors in tracking, especially when target motion patterns are complex.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that use information about target location, UAV platform type, sensor payload capabilities, and target-to-UAV speed ratios to select sub-algorithms for generating desired platform positions and sensor orientation commands, enabling autonomous tracking by selecting from a suite of sub-algorithms for maintaining the target within the sensor's field of view.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human operators monitor imagery to maintain target in view, then target tracking reliability is improved, but operator workload increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget tracking reliabilityVSAvoidoperator efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables autonomous target tracking where the UAV automatically adjusts its position and orientation to maintain the target within the sensor field of view. The autonomous tracker receives target location data and autonomously computes platform positions and sensor orientations, eliminating the need for continuous human operator intervention while maintaining reliable tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If human operators monitor imagery to maintain target in view, then target tracking reliability is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget tracking reliabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous tracking system continuously monitors target location and automatically adjusts platform position and sensor orientation without requiring operator attention. This self-service capability maintains reliable tracking while eliminating the time operators would spend manually monitoring and adjusting the view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the autonomous tracker continuously receives updated target location data, compares it with the current sensor field of view, and automatically computes corrective platform positions and sensor orientations to maintain the target in view, enabling rapid response to target motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If autonomous tracking is implemented, then operator workload is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator workloadVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous tracker serves as a self-service module that automatically performs target tracking computations and generates control commands. It receives input data (target location, platform state, sensor capabilities) and autonomously determines platform positions and sensor orientations, reducing operator workload while managing system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking system is segmented into distinct functional modules: the autonomous tracker that computes desired platform positions and sensor orientations, the platform that executes position changes, and the sensor that adjusts orientation. This segmentation manages complexity by dividing the autonomous tracking function into manageable, specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive sub-algorithm selection is used, then tracking adaptability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking adaptabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous tracker dynamically selects from multiple sub-algorithms based on the specific tracking scenario and target motion patterns. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize its tracking approach for different situations (e.g., maneuvering targets vs. stationary targets) while managing computational complexity through conditional logic rather than a single complex algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7970507B2Method and system for autonomous tracking of a mobile target by an unmanned aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2011.06.28 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7970507B2 patent drawing
  • US7970507B2 patent drawing
  • US7970507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides a system and method for autonomously tracking a moving target from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with a variety of airframe and sensor payload capabilities so that the target remains within the vehicle's sensor field of view regardless of the specific target motion patterns. The invention uses information about target location, UAV platform type and states, sensor payload capability, and ratio of target-to-UAV speeds to select from a suite of sub-algorithms, each of which generates desired platform positions (in form of waypoints) and/or sensor orientation commands to keep the target in view.