UAV Airfoil Design with Virtual Camber for Low-Speed Stall Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional airfoils used in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges such as severe stall properties, high manufacturing complexity, limited internal volume, and difficulty in integrating external components like trailing edge flaps due to complex shapes, which hinder their performance and functionality.

Innovation Solution

The airfoil design features an upper surface with a top local surface angle of less than 5 degrees and a lower surface with a bottom local surface angle of less than 5 degrees at specific chord subsections, creating a 'virtual camber' that enhances lift, reduces drag, and allows for increased internal volume and easier integration of flaps, improving stall performance and manufacturing simplicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If complex curvature airfoil shapes are used to achieve good low-speed performance, then lift performance is improved, but structural weight increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the airfoil by limiting the local surface angles on the upper and lower surfaces to less than 5 degrees at specific chord subsections. This parameter constraint creates a flatter, simpler airfoil geometry that is easier to manufacture while maintaining low-speed performance through the resulting virtual camber effect rather than complex curvature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If thin trailing edge airfoil designs are used to achieve good aerodynamic performance, then drag is reduced, but integration of trailing edge flaps becomes difficult or impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedragVSAvoidintegration of trailing edge flaps
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention modifies the trailing edge geometry by constraining the local surface angles to less than 5 degrees, which creates a thicker, more robust trailing edge structure. This geometric parameter change enables the integration of trailing edge flaps and other control surfaces while maintaining aerodynamic efficiency through the virtual camber mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If high camber airfoil shapes are used to achieve good low-speed performance, then lift is improved, but interior volume is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveliftVSAvoidinterior volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the traditional approach to generating lift at low speeds. Instead of using high camber (curved upper surface) to generate lift, it uses low local surface angles to create a flatter geometry that produces a virtual camber effect. This inversion of the design approach simultaneously improves lift performance and increases interior volume for fuel storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If complex curvature airfoil shapes are used to achieve good low-speed performance, then stall characteristics are improved, but severity of stall increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestall characteristicsVSAvoidsevere stall properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the surface angle parameters to less than 5 degrees on both upper and lower surfaces at critical chord subsections. This parameter modification creates a flatter airfoil geometry that delays flow separation and reduces the severity of stall characteristics while maintaining good low-speed performance through the virtual camber effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables UAVs to operate effectively at slower speeds with reduced risk of stall, improved flight efficiency, increased fuel storage capacity, and easier assembly, while being less complex to manufacture compared to traditional airfoils.

Implementation Method 1

an airfoil configured for low speed performance in an unmanned aerial vehicle includes an upper surface having an upper surface portion with a top local surface angle magnitude of less than 5 degrees at a subsection of a chord and a lower surface having a lower surface portion with a bottom local surface angle magnitude of less than 5 degrees at the subsection of the chord

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed can be achieved independently in various embodiments or may be combined in yet other embodiments further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3147204B1Low speed airfoil design for aerodynamic improved performance of uavs
Publication Date: 2020.08.19 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3147204B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3147204B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3147204B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An airfoil (106) configured for low speed performance in an unmanned aerial vehicle (100) includes an upper surface (120) having an upper surface portion (164) with a top local surface angle magnitude of less than 5 degrees at a subsection (168) of a chord (128) and a lower surface (122) having a lower surface portion (166) with a bottom local surface angle magnitude of less than 5 degrees at the subsection of the chord. The chord (128) is defined by a line starting at a leading edge (124) of the airfoil (106) and extending to a trailing edge (126) of the airfoil (106).