UAV Airspace Management Platform for Real-Time Conflict Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The lack of real-time airspace management systems for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) leads to interference with firefighting, law enforcement, and emergency response operations, causing delays, safety risks, and increased costs, as well as potential collisions with authorized aircraft and national security concerns.

Innovation Solution

A platform and system that includes records of certified requestors, airspace management rules, and a notification system over telecommunications networks, allowing for real-time management and restriction of UAV use through mobile devices, enabling dynamic airspace management and enforcement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time airspace management system is implemented, then public safety and operational efficiency are improved, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublic safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary airspace management system that mediates between UAV operators and authorized aircraft. This system receives restriction requests from certified requestors, validates them against management rules, and broadcasts notifications to relevant parties. The intermediary layer resolves the contradiction by providing centralized coordination without requiring direct complex interactions between all aircraft and UAVs, thereby improving public safety while managing system complexity through structured protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where restriction requests are evaluated and notifications are broadcast to affected parties. The platform continuously monitors airspace conditions, receives new restriction requests, and updates the airspace management state in real-time. This feedback loop enables dynamic adaptation to changing conditions, improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making based on predefined rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If real-time airspace management is implemented, then response time delays are reduced, but infrastructure and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time delaysVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing airspace management rules, certifying requestors in advance, and maintaining real-time databases of restricted and authorized airspaces. When a restriction request is received, the system can quickly validate it against pre-existing rules and broadcast notifications immediately. This preliminary preparation enables rapid response to airspace conflicts without requiring complex real-time analysis, thereby reducing response time delays while controlling operational costs through efficient processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The airspace management system provides self-service capabilities where certified requestors can autonomously submit restriction requests, and the system automatically validates them against management rules and broadcasts appropriate notifications. This automated self-service approach reduces the need for manual intervention and extensive human resources, thereby reducing operational costs while maintaining fast response times through automated real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If UAV use is unrestricted, then operational freedom and accessibility are improved, but safety risks and interference with authorized operations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational freedomVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating differentiated airspace zones with different operational characteristics. The system maintains multiple databases including restricted airspaces, authorized airspaces, and active restriction requests, allowing UAVs to operate freely in unrestricted areas while imposing specific constraints in designated restricted zones. This localized approach preserves operational freedom where appropriate while addressing safety risks in specific areas through targeted restrictions rather than blanket prohibitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by making airspace restrictions temporary and adaptable rather than fixed and permanent. Restriction requests can be activated, modified, or terminated based on changing operational conditions. The platform dynamically updates the airspace management state in real-time, allowing operational freedom to be granted or restricted as needed. This dynamic approach balances operational freedom with safety by enabling flexible adaptation to current conditions rather than imposing static constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12125390B2Apparatus, system and method for managing airspace
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 GE VENTURES
  • US12125390B2 patent drawing
  • US12125390B2 patent drawing
  • US12125390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, system and method for managing airspace for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The apparatus, system and method may include a platform comprising at least records of certified administratively acceptable requestors of restricted use of the airspace for UAVs, a plurality of airspace management rules for UAVs, and a broadcaster for providing notifications over at least one telecommunications network; and a plurality of applications, each instantiated by a processor on one of a plurality of corresponded devices by non-transitory computing code, wherein the plurality of corresponded devices comprises at least a plurality of mobile devices. A first of the plurality of applications may be capable of receiving the restricted UAV use request from a requestor within a physical area of the restricted UAV use request, and of forwarding the restricted UAV use request and an identification of the requestor to the platform over the at least one telecommunications network.