UAV Architecture Design Using SysML and Modelica Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current design paradigms for unmanned aerial vehicle systems (UAS) face challenges due to complexity in traditional architecture frameworks like DoDAF and flexibility issues in SysML, which lack mathematical analysis capabilities and require a more structured approach for operational requirement capture and architecture development.

Innovation Solution

A model-based architecture design method for UAS that integrates SysML and Modelica modeling languages, establishing a framework for multi-domain, multi-dimensional simulation and verification through spatio-temporal, logical, and mathematical models, ensuring rigorous and flexible architecture design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If DoDAF architecture framework is used for UAS design, then comprehensive system planning capability is improved, but framework complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem planning capabilityVSAvoidframework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the DoDAF framework into three focused viewpoints (operational, logical, physical) with specific view templates for each, reducing the overwhelming 8-viewpoint structure to essential components needed for UAS design while maintaining comprehensive planning capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and focuses on only the most relevant viewpoints from DoDAF (operational, logical, physical) that are essential for UAS design, eliminating unnecessary complexity from the original 8-viewpoint framework while preserving core system planning capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If SysML is used for architecture modeling, then modeling flexibility is improved, but semantic ambiguity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling flexibilityVSAvoidsemantic ambiguity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by defining specific semantic rules and constraints for each SysML diagram type within the UAS context, making the modeling language precise for particular purposes while maintaining overall flexibility through selective application of standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of semantic rules and view templates that bridge SysML's flexible notation system with the need for precise semantic meaning, translating general SysML constructs into domain-specific meanings for UAS architecture modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If SysML is used for architecture description, then formal modeling capability is improved, but mathematical analysis capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformal modeling precisionVSAvoidmathematical analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges SysML's formal architectural modeling capabilities with Modelica's mathematical analysis capabilities by establishing transformation rules that convert SysML models into Modelica models, combining the strengths of both languages for comprehensive UAS analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of manufacture

If existing SysML to Modelica transformation standard is used, then transformation capability is improved, but semantic transformation capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation capabilityVSAvoidsemantic transformation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces view templates and semantic rules as intermediary elements between SysML and Modelica, enabling not just syntactic but also semantic transformation by mapping the meaning and intent of SysML architectural models into Mathematically executable Modelica models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230021467A1Model-Based System Architecture Design Method for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Systems
Publication Date: 2023.01.26 BEIHANG UNIV
  • US20230021467A1 patent drawing
  • US20230021467A1 patent drawing
  • US20230021467A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a model-based architecture design method for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system, which aims to deal with challenges of changeable operational requirements, shortened design period, and decreased technical risks in a current UAS design process. A data-driven architecture development method is used. By establishing an architecture development framework of the UAS, a framework modeling process oriented to different viewpoints is designed, and modeling and simulation specifications based on SysML and Modelica are defined, such that design of the UAS starts from conception and confirmation of an operational concept. The method focuses on forward analysis and design of a system framework, and concept verification and metric closed-loop are carried out at an early stage of the design of the UAS by virtue of logic modeling and system simulation.