UAV Border Detection and Flight Path Correction for Field Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous UAV systems for pesticide/fertilizer application face challenges in accurately defining field boundaries, leading to potential missed areas or overspray due to position errors in digital maps, which are labor-intensive and costly to correct with high-end positioning systems.

Innovation Solution

A vision-based border identification and dynamic route planning system that uses image sensors and machine learning to predict and adjust the flight path of UAVs in real-time, allowing for accurate coverage of agricultural fields without manual surveying or high-end positioning systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If digital map boundary information is used to plan the UAV route, then the route planning is simple and quick, but the position errors of 3-6 meters cause incomplete coverage or overspray beyond field boundaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning efficiencyVSAvoidboundary positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical surveying methods with a vision-based system using cameras and image processing algorithms. The UAV captures images of the field boundary, and computer vision algorithms automatically identify and locate the boundary features, substituting physical surveying equipment and manual measurement processes with optical detection and computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces visual features (natural or artificial boundary markers) as intermediaries between the UAV's positioning system and the actual field boundary. These features serve as reference points that the vision system detects and uses to calculate precise boundary locations, mediating the relationship between GPS coordinates and ground reality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If high-end positioning systems are used on the UAV to achieve accurate positions, then the boundary detection accuracy is improved, but the cost and complexity of the system increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary detection accuracyVSAvoidpositioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex high-precision positioning systems (such as RTK-GPS or laser ranging equipment) with a vision-based detection system using standard cameras and image processing. The boundary location is determined through visual recognition of boundary features rather than through complex positioning hardware, achieving comparable accuracy with simpler equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a visual copy or representation of the field boundary by capturing images and processing them to extract boundary information. Instead of directly measuring the boundary with precision instruments, the system creates an image-based model of the boundary that can be analyzed and used for route planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If manual surveying is conducted to accurately identify field borders, then the position error is reduced to centimeter level, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary positioning accuracyVSAvoidsurvey time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual surveying operations with an automated vision-based system. The UAV flies over the field capturing images, and computer vision algorithms automatically process these images to identify and locate boundary features, eliminating the need for operators to physically walk the perimeter and manually record coordinates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary boundary identification by having the UAV capture images of the field boundary before the actual pesticide application mission. The vision system processes these images in advance to determine boundary locations and generate corrected route information, so that when the UAV begins spraying, the accurate boundary data is already available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Extent of automation

If the UAV follows a route based on digital map boundaries with position errors, then the autonomous operation is simple, but the pesticides may be missed in areas within 3-6 meters of the border or sprayed outside the field

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous flight capabilityVSAvoidpesticide application completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the vision system continuously monitors the UAV's position relative to detected boundary features during flight. The system compares the actual boundary location (detected via vision) with the planned route (based on GPS coordinates) and provides feedback to the flight control system to make real-time corrections, ensuring the UAV maintains proper positioning relative to the actual field boundary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the boundary detection dynamic by using real-time or near-real-time image capture and processing during the UAV's flight mission. Rather than relying on static pre-surveyed boundary data, the system dynamically identifies and tracks boundary features as the UAV moves, allowing the route to adapt to the actual field geometry encountered during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10991258B2Real-time learning and detection of a border in a flight path
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 SUZHOU EAVISION ROBOTIC TECH CO LTD
  • US10991258B2 patent drawing
  • US10991258B2 patent drawing
  • US10991258B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A specification of an expected border of a bounded area is received. One or more images of at least a portion of the bounded area that is at least a threshold distance away from the expected border are received to generate a model of the bounded area. A current location position of the aerial vehicle is used to determine that the aerial vehicle is within the threshold distance away from the expected border. In response, an updated expected border is determined using the generated model of the bounded area and a border image of at least a portion of the expected border captured by an image sensor.