UAV Collision Avoidance via Stereo Depth Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current UAV systems lack effective collision detection and avoidance capabilities, relying heavily on pilot experience and manual intervention, which can be inadequate in complex or dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a UAV system equipped with a camera and a logic device that captures a stream of images, identifies objects, performs depth estimation, and determines a collision path based on the depth estimation and the UAV's direction of travel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual pilot intervention is used for collision detection and avoidance, then the system complexity is low, but the safety and reliability are insufficient in complex or dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UAV system performs self-detection and self-avoidance of collisions through automated image capture, object identification, depth estimation, and collision path determination. The system serves itself by eliminating the need for manual pilot intervention in collision detection and avoidance, thereby improving safety while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated autonomous functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If automated collision detection and avoidance systems are implemented, then the safety and reliability improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The camera system serves multiple functions: capturing images for object identification, estimating depth through frame comparison, and providing data for collision path determination. By making the camera a multi-functional component, the system achieves improved safety through automated collision detection and avoidance without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If depth estimation is performed through frame comparison, then the measurement precision of distance is improved, but the loss of time for processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs depth estimation by comparing frames, but can be configured to process only relevant portions of frames or use selective comparison strategies. This partial processing approach maintains adequate depth estimation accuracy for collision avoidance while reducing the overall processing time required, balancing measurement precision with time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12307915B2Collision detection and avoidance for unmanned aerial vehicle systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 AERYON LABS
  • US12307915B2 patent drawing
  • US12307915B2 patent drawing
  • US12307915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for UAV collision detection and avoidance are provided. A UAV may include a camera configured to capture a stream of images of a scene, the stream of images including a first frame and a second frame captured after the first frame. The UAV may further include a logic device configured to identify an object in the stream of images, perform a depth estimation between the UAV and the detected object based on a comparison between the first frame and the second frame, and determine a collision path of the UAV to the object based on the depth estimation and a direction of travel of the UAV.