UAV Collision Avoidance Using Virtual World Trajectory Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) lack effective collision detection and avoidance systems, leading to potential damage or destruction when performing high-risk maneuvers or navigating through obstacles, as they require skilled operators and are fragile, making them prone to collisions even at low speeds.

Innovation Solution

A collision avoidance system that creates a virtual world model of the flight area using physical space data and a physics engine, determines the UAV's position and predicted trajectory, and performs evasive actions to prevent collisions by overriding user control when a collision is imminent, utilizing sensors and capability parameters to adjust the UAV's flight path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual piloting control is used for UAVs, then the operator can perform complex maneuvers, but the risk of collision increases due to human error and lack of experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual piloting controlVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The UAV performs self-service through autonomous collision detection and avoidance functionality. The system automatically detects obstacles using sensors, predicts potential collisions, and executes evasive maneuvers without requiring constant human intervention, thereby reducing collision risk while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring sensor data, updating the virtual world model in real-time, predicting trajectories, and adjusting control commands dynamically. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the UAV to respond to changing environmental conditions and avoid collisions proactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If advanced aerial maneuvers are performed by UAVs, then racing performance improves, but the likelihood of collision with obstacles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveracing performanceVSAvoidcollision likelihood
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously predicting future trajectories and identifying potential collision risks before they materialize. The virtual world model anticipates obstacles and computes evasive maneuvers in advance, allowing the UAV to maintain high-speed racing performance while proactively avoiding collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The collision avoidance system dynamically adapts to changing flight conditions by continuously updating the virtual world model, adjusting trajectory predictions, and modifying evasive maneuvers in real-time. This dynamic response enables the UAV to perform aggressive racing maneuvers while maintaining safety margins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If UAVs are flown in the vicinity of obstacles, then flight versatility increases, but the risk of damage from collision increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight versatilityVSAvoidcollision damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The virtual world model serves as an intermediary between the physical environment and the UAV's control system. It creates a simulated representation of obstacles and flight conditions, allowing the system to plan and execute safe maneuvers in complex environments without directly interacting with physical obstacles, thereby enabling versatile flight while minimizing collision damage risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If collision avoidance systems are added to UAVs, then safety improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a virtual copy of the physical world through the virtual world model, which represents obstacles, terrain, and flight conditions. This digital twin allows the collision avoidance system to simulate and predict flight scenarios without requiring complex physical sensors or actuators, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high safety standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11222549B2Collision detection and avoidance
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
  • US11222549B2 patent drawing
  • US11222549B2 patent drawing
  • US11222549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision avoidance system for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) receives physical space data for a flight area and creates a virtual world model to represent the flight area by mapping the physical space data with a physics engine. The automatic collision avoidance system creates a virtual UAV model to represent the UAV in the virtual world model. The automatic collision avoidance system receives flight data for the UAV and determines a current position of the virtual UAV model within the virtual world model. The automatic collision avoidance system determines a predicted trajectory of the virtual UAV model within the virtual world model, and determines whether the predicted trajectory will result in a collision of the virtual UAV model with the virtual world model. The automatic collision avoidance system performs evasive actions by the UAV, in response to determining that the predicted trajectory will result in a collision.