UAV Geolocation Exclusion Zone Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current strategies for managing human-wildlife interactions, such as controlling animal populations and establishing habitat barriers, often require active human intervention and are ineffective in determining evolving geolocation patterns of wild animals, leading to potential conflicts and damages.

Innovation Solution

An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system equipped with a processor-based monitoring device, identification device, and mapping device to track geolocation information, identify animals, and determine exclusion zones, minimizing direct interactions and providing deterrence actions based on risk analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current conflict management strategies (controlling animal populations, relocation, habitat barriers) are used to prevent human-wildlife interactions, then human safety and property protection are improved, but active human intervention is required and evolving geolocation patterns of wild animals cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman safetyVSAvoidactive human intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by deploying autonomous UAVs that independently track wildlife geolocations, process imaging data, generate exclusion zones, and provide deterrence actions without requiring active human intervention. The UAVs autonomously monitor animal populations and dynamically update exclusion zones based on real-time movement patterns, eliminating the need for continuous human monitoring while maintaining reliable safety protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical monitoring systems with automated electronic imaging and processing systems. UAVs equipped with cameras and processors automatically capture wildlife locations, analyze movement patterns, and generate exclusion zones without human physical intervention. This substitution of mechanical human monitoring with electronic automation systems enables continuous surveillance while reducing active human involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If current conflict management strategies are implemented to prevent human-wildlife interactions, then property damage prevention is improved, but effectiveness in determining evolving geolocation patterns of wild animals deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty damageVSAvoidevolving geolocation patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where UAVs repeatedly image wildlife, track geolocation changes over time, and dynamically update exclusion zones based on observed movement patterns. This ongoing feedback mechanism captures evolving geolocation information that static barriers cannot detect, enabling the system to adapt to changing animal behaviors while preventing property damage through real-time zone adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static habitat barriers to dynamic exclusion zones that automatically adjust based on real-time wildlife movement data. UAVs continuously monitor animal geolocations and update exclusion zone boundaries to reflect evolving patterns, ensuring property protection remains effective while capturing current spatial information about animal behavior that fixed structures cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If static habitat barriers are established to prevent human-wildlife interactions, then human safety is improved, but adaptability to evolving animal migration patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman safetyVSAvoidadaptability to migration patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces static barriers with dynamic exclusion zones that automatically adapt to changing wildlife migration patterns. UAVs continuously track animal movements and update zone boundaries in real-time, enabling the safety system to evolve with animal behavior while maintaining reliable protection. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the system to remain effective as animals change their migration routes and behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively establishing exclusion zones before human-wildlife conflicts occur. UAVs monitor wildlife movements and preemptively update exclusion zones to anticipate animal migration patterns, preventing potential conflicts before they happen. This proactive approach maintains high safety levels while adapting to evolving animal behaviors through advance zone adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10779509B2Unmanned aerial vehicle for generating geolocation exclusion zones
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10779509B2 patent drawing
  • US10779509B2 patent drawing
  • US10779509B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned aerial vehicle for determining geolocation exclusion zones of animals. The unmanned aerial vehicle includes a processor-based monitoring device to track geolocation information associated with an animal from the unmanned aerial vehicle, an identification device mounted on the unmanned aerial vehicle to identify the animal and to track a position of the animal over time, and a mapping device coupled to the monitoring device to determine locations where the animal has traversed and to identify where an encounter with the animal is reduced.