UAV Flight Planning with 4D Trajectory Obstacle Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing UAV flight planning systems struggle to efficiently compute flight plans that navigate around obstacles with both spatial and temporal dimensions, such as restricted airspaces and weather phenomena, which can lead to infeasible or unattainable trips.

Innovation Solution

The development of algorithms and systems that calculate 3-D and 4-D trajectories for UAVs, incorporating spatial and temporal obstacles, and dynamically reroute flights to avoid these obstacles, including Temporary Flight Restrictions and other time-dependent constraints, using graph theory and aircraft performance models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional flight planning systems are used, then the system complexity is low, but the ability to navigate around temporal and spatial obstacles is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to navigate around temporal and spatial obstaclesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends traditional 3D flight planning to 4D by incorporating temporal dimension. Flight paths are represented as four-dimensional trajectories (x, y, z, t) to navigate around temporal obstacles such as Temporary Flight Restrictions. This dimensional extension enables the system to account for time-dependent constraints while maintaining comprehensive obstacle avoidance capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The flight planning system segments the navigation problem into multiple components: spatial obstacle avoidance, temporal obstacle avoidance, and integrated 4D trajectory optimization. By dividing the complex planning task into manageable segments handling different obstacle types separately before integration, the system achieves high adaptability without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If 4D trajectories are calculated to account for temporal obstacles, then the navigation accuracy improves, but the computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of 4D trajectories by pre-computing flight paths that account for anticipated temporal obstacles such as TFRs. By calculating these trajectories in advance before actual flight execution, the system achieves high trajectory accuracy without incurring computational delays during critical flight phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The flight planning system dynamically adjusts computational depth based on flight phases and obstacle types. For routine segments, simplified models are used to reduce computation time, while for critical segments involving complex temporal obstacles, more rigorous 4D trajectory calculations are performed to ensure accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple destinations are visited, then the mission versatility improves, but the flight plan complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission versatilityVSAvoidflight plan complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal flight planning framework that handles multiple destination visits through a single integrated 4D trajectory optimization process. The system uses a unified cost function that simultaneously considers spatial constraints, temporal obstacles, and mission requirements across multiple destinations, eliminating the need for separate planning procedures for different mission types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If real-time rerouting is performed to avoid obstacles, then the flight safety improves, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The flight planning system incorporates self-service capabilities by implementing on-board computational resources that can perform real-time rerouting decisions autonomously. The UAV itself possesses the computational ability to detect obstacles and recalculate 4D trajectories without constant ground station intervention, improving flight safety while distributing computational resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8082102B2Computing flight plans for UAVs while routing around obstacles having spatial and temporal dimensions
Publication Date: 2011.12.20 BOEING DIGITAL SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8082102B2 patent drawing
  • US8082102B2 patent drawing
  • US8082102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This description provides tools and techniques for computing flight plans for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) while routing around obstacles having spatial and temporal dimensions. Methods provided by these tools may receive data representing destinations to be visited by the UAVs, and may receive data representing obstacles having spatial and temporal dimensions. These methods may also calculate trajectories spatial and temporal dimensions, by which the UAV may travel from one destination to another, and may at least attempt to compute flight plans for the UAVs that incorporate these trajectories. The methods may also determine whether these trajectories intersect any obstacles, and at least attempt to reroute the trajectories around the obstacles. These tools may also provide systems and computer-readable media containing software for performing any of the foregoing methods.