UAV Hazardous Materials Flight Path Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current UAV systems lack the capability to generate and display flight paths specific to hazardous materials, environmental conditions, and regulatory procedures, and face challenges in accurately collecting and validating data due to localized air disturbances and limited flight times.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives inputs for incident locations and measurement zones to generate and display flight paths for UAVs, using georectification and graphics modules to produce emissions indicators on satellite aerial maps, ensuring spatial accuracy and efficient data collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the UAV hovers during data collection, then the spatial accuracy of collected data is improved, but the flight time is reduced and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial accuracy of dataVSAvoidarea assessment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates the spatial offset between the UAV position and the actual sampling location based on sensor response time and UAV velocity. This preliminary correction allows the system to maintain measurement precision without hovering, as the data is adjusted to reflect the correct spatial location despite the UAV being in motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a corrected copy of the spatial data by applying offset calculations to map the collected emissions data to the actual geographic location. This allows the moving UAV to collect data that is accurately attributed to stationary geographic coordinates, resolving the contradiction between motion and spatial accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If the UAV moves at high speed to maximize area coverage, then productivity is improved, but the spatial accuracy of collected data deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea coverage speedVSAvoidspatial accuracy of data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical solution of hovering (physical stationary position) with a computational approach. By using sensor response time data and UAV velocity to calculate spatial offsets, the system achieves accurate geographic mapping without requiring the UAV to physically stop, thus maintaining high speed coverage while ensuring data accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the spatial offset parameters based on real-time UAV velocity and sensor response time. This parameter-based correction allows the system to maintain measurement precision across varying flight speeds, enabling high-speed operation without sacrificing spatial accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If the UAV operates with limited battery power, then flight time is constrained, but moving faster reduces total area assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight timeVSAvoidtotal area assessed
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic flight path optimization that adjusts the UAV's velocity and sampling rate based on real-time conditions and remaining battery power. This dynamic approach allows the UAV to maximize area coverage within the constrained flight time by optimizing speed and sampling frequency throughout the mission, rather than maintaining a fixed speed profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If the system collects detailed emissions data at high resolution, then measurement precision is improved, but the amount of data to be processed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions data resolutionVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by collecting high-resolution emissions data only in areas where hazardous materials are detected or suspected. In low-risk areas, the system reduces sampling frequency or resolution, thereby maintaining measurement precision where needed while reducing overall data volume and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11922821B2Systems and methods for collecting and analyzing hazardous materials information using an unmanned aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 ALLIANCE SOLUTIONS GROUP INC
  • US11922821B2 patent drawing
  • US11922821B2 patent drawing
  • US11922821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method includes receiving a first input associated with an incident location of an incident. A second input associated with a measurement zone surrounding the incident location is received. The method further includes producing, via a display monitor, a set of waypoints associated with a flight path of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based on the first input and the second input. The set of waypoints is displayed on a satellite aerial map including the incident location.