UAV Hive Communication Using Safe-Zone Data Transmission Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operating in dangerous airspace face challenges in securely communicating and transmitting data without risking intelligence leak, especially when multiple UAVs are deployed in a hive configuration.

Innovation Solution

UAVs receive instructions from a central server to determine safe transmission zones using maps or criteria, preventing data transfer in unsafe zones and employing sensors to detect potential interceptors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If UAVs transmit data freely within the hive to enable quick coverage and communication, then productivity and information sharing are improved, but the risk of intelligence leak and security breaches increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidintelligence leak risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining safe transmission zones and security parameters before data transmission occurs. The central server establishes geographic boundaries and security criteria in advance, allowing UAVs to quickly determine whether transmission is permitted without real-time security analysis, thus maintaining fast communication while preventing intelligence leaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The central server acts as an intermediary between UAVs, managing security protocols and transmission authorization. Rather than UAVs directly assessing security risks themselves, the central server mediates by receiving transmission requests, evaluating them against predefined security criteria, and authorizing or blocking transmissions accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system implements comprehensive security checks and zone verification before each transmission, then security and data integrity are improved, but device complexity and transmission delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission securityVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Security parameters, safe zones, and transmission criteria are predetermined and configured in advance by the central server. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for complex real-time security analysis during transmission, as UAVs simply need to check whether their current location falls within pre-defined safe zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by converting complex security assessment into simple geographic coordinate comparison. Instead of analyzing multiple security factors in real-time, the system transforms the security decision into a straightforward parameter check: comparing current UAV position against pre-stored safe zone coordinates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If UAVs continuously monitor their location and transmission environment to ensure safety, then security reliability is improved, but energy consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission safetyVSAvoidUAV energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system simplifies continuous monitoring into periodic position checks against pre-defined zones. Instead of continuously analyzing complex security parameters, UAVs only need to periodically report their geographic coordinates and receive binary authorization decisions from the central server, dramatically reducing computational and energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial monitoring by checking only the essential parameter (current location) against critical thresholds (safe zone boundaries) rather than continuously monitoring all possible security factors. This partial approach provides sufficient security assurance while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250350951A1Safe unmanned aerial vehicle hive communication and data transmission
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 UAVPATENT CORP
  • US20250350951A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350951A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350951A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for collecting data and safe transmission of the collected data is configured to receive an instruction from a central server. The instruction includes one or more safe zones or one or more unsafe zones. The UAV is also configured to collect and transmit data to one or more nearby UAVs and/or the central server based on a command received from the central server. In response to determining a need for transmitting the collected data to one or more nearby UAVs and/or the central server, the UAV identifies a current location of itself and determines whether the current location is in a safe zone or an unsafe zone based on the instruction. In response to determining that the current location is not in a safe zone or is in an unsafe zone, the UAV prevents the collected data from being transmitted.