UAV Hovering Traffic Control System for Vehicle Speed Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic control methods, such as speed bumps, often fail to effectively slow vehicles without jostling drivers or damaging vehicles, and may not provide adequate safety for pedestrians and drivers, especially at specific spatial locations like railroad crossings or pedestrian crosswalks.

Innovation Solution

A traffic control system utilizing an unmanned air vehicle (UAV) that hovers above the roadway to alert drivers to slow down by comparing vehicle speed or distance to predefined criteria, avoiding physical contact and thus minimizing damage, and can be used at various spatial locations like railroad crossings or pedestrian crosswalks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If speed bumps are used to slow vehicles, then vehicle speed is reduced at the defined spatial location, but the driver and passengers are jostled and the vehicle may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle speedVSAvoidvehicle damage and passenger discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical speed bump system with an optical/electronic monitoring and alert system. The controller detects vehicle speed using sensors and activates visual or audible alerts to encourage drivers to slow down, eliminating the need for physical speed bumps that cause vehicle damage and passenger discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary alerting mechanism between the vehicle and the spatial location. Instead of direct physical interaction with speed bumps, the system uses intermediate signals (visual/audible alerts) to communicate speed violations to drivers, allowing them to self-correct their behavior without physical impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional traffic control signage is used, then drivers are informed of speed requirements, but driver adherence is insufficient to ensure safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver adherence to speed limitsVSAvoidtraffic control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where sensors continuously monitor vehicle speed, the controller compares the measured speed against predefined limits, and alert mechanisms provide real-time feedback to drivers when speed violations occur. This closed-loop system significantly improves driver adherence compared to static signage alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables drivers to self-regulate their speed based on real-time feedback from the alert mechanisms. Rather than relying solely on external enforcement or passive signage, drivers actively adjust their behavior in response to the system's alerts, making the traffic control more effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If speed bumps are deployed to control vehicle behavior, then vehicle speed is reduced, but the system is costly to install and maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle speed controlVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive mechanical speed bump infrastructure with an electronic monitoring and alerting system. The sensor-controller-alert architecture eliminates the need for physical road modifications, reducing both installation and ongoing maintenance costs while achieving the same speed control objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic traffic control system can be applied at multiple spatial locations with different speed requirements by simply reconfiguring the controller parameters and alert messages. This multi-functional capability eliminates the need for custom-built speed bumps at each location, reducing overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10926876B2Traffic control system, controller and method for directing vehicle behavior at a defined spatial location
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US10926876B2 patent drawing
  • US10926876B2 patent drawing
  • US10926876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A traffic control system, a controller and an associated method are provided to direct a vehicle to slow or, in some instances, stop at a defined spatial location along the roadway. In the context of a controller, the controller includes at least one processor and memory including computer program code with the memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the controller to receive information indicative of at least one characteristic of the behavior of the vehicle as the vehicle approaches a defined location. Based on the information, the controller is caused to compare the behavior of the vehicle to a defined criterion and, in response, to cause an unmanned air vehicle (UAV) to maintain a hovering position in which the UAV hovers above the roadway so as to be within the path of travel of the vehicle on the roadway.