UAV Image Analysis for Multi-Object Damage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for damage analysis of multiple discrete objects, such as vehicles in a parking lot, are labor-intensive, prone to errors, and delayed, especially during large-scale events like hailstorms, leading to monetary losses and operational delays.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system utilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) logic modules to quickly and accurately capture and analyze imagery of damaged objects, identifying damage, calculating repair costs, and generating insurance claims.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual damage analysis methods are used for multiple discrete objects, then analysis can be performed with simple equipment, but the process is extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage analysis speedVSAvoidtime for damage assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection methods with an automated system comprising aerial vehicles for imagery capture, processors for image analysis, and algorithms for damage detection. This substitution of mechanical human inspection with automated technological systems directly resolves the contradiction by dramatically increasing analysis speed while eliminating the time loss associated with manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service damage analysis by automatically capturing imagery, processing images, detecting damage, and generating reports without requiring continuous human intervention. The automated pipeline performs all analysis functions independently, resolving the productivity-time contradiction by eliminating labor-intensive manual assessment while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual damage analysis is performed, then equipment complexity remains low, but error rates increase and monetary losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of damage analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces error-prone manual analysis with automated image processing systems that use algorithms for consistent, objective damage assessment. This substitution eliminates human error while accepting the necessary increase in system complexity, as the automated machinery provides reliable, repeatable results that reduce monetary losses from incorrect assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates accurate digital copies of damaged objects through aerial imagery, allowing repeated analysis without physical contact or degradation of the original objects. These digital copies enable multiple analysts or algorithms to examine the same damage event independently, improving reliability through verification while managing complexity through virtual rather than physical replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If damage analysis is delayed, then resource requirements remain manageable, but operational revenue is delayed and losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing throughputVSAvoidoperational revenue delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous automated damage analysis that operates without interruption from one imagery capture through to final report generation. This continuous processing eliminates idle time between analysis stages, maximizing productivity while minimizing the energy loss represented by delayed revenue recognition. The system maintains uninterrupted operation throughout the entire assessment workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary damage assessment immediately upon capturing imagery, generating initial findings before formal claim processing begins. This preliminary action accelerates the overall workflow by having analysis results ready in advance, increasing productivity while reducing the time delay that would otherwise cause operational revenue loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10902480B2Systems and methods for automated multi-object damage analysis
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
  • US10902480B2 patent drawing
  • US10902480B2 patent drawing
  • US10902480B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for automatically ascertaining an estimated amount of damage to a plurality of objects at a location by utilizing one or more Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), e.g., “drone” devices to capture imagery of the location and utilizing Artificial Intelligence (Al) logic modules to analyze the captured imagery.