UAV Sensor-Correlated Imaging for Motion-Blur Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges in capturing high-quality images due to factors like motion during image capture, which can result in blurry or out-of-focus photos, and existing systems lack efficient methods to ensure image quality meets predefined thresholds in real-time.

Innovation Solution

The UAV system incorporates sensors to analyze image quality in real-time, using metadata and timestamps to determine if images meet quality thresholds, and automatically retakes images if they do not, while providing reduced-quality images for immediate review and analysis to ensure compliance with quality standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the UAV captures images at high frequency during flight, then the quantity of images obtained increases, but the image quality deteriorates due to motion blur and out-of-focus photos

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage capture frequencyVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time image quality assessment by analyzing metadata (sharpness, focus metrics) from captured images. When quality falls below thresholds, the system provides feedback to automatically trigger re-capture commands, ensuring only high-quality images are retained while maintaining high capture frequency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary image quality evaluation immediately after capture by examining metadata indicators such as sharpness and focus metrics. This preliminary assessment determines whether the image meets quality thresholds before final storage, preventing low-quality images from consuming storage resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the UAV automatically retakes low-quality images, then the image quality improves, but the flight time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidflight time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial re-capture action by selectively retaking only those images that fail quality thresholds based on metadata analysis, rather than re-capturing all images. This selective approach minimizes additional flight time while ensuring adequate quality coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The UAV performs self-service quality control by autonomously assessing image quality through metadata analysis and automatically triggering re-captures when needed, without requiring external intervention. This reduces the operational overhead and minimizes additional flight time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If the UAV transmits all captured images to the ground station, then the completeness of data is improved, but the data transmission time and bandwidth consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiddata transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transmits only the essential quality assessment metadata (sharpness scores, focus metrics, quality flags) to the ground station, separating critical quality information from the full image data. This allows quality monitoring without transmitting complete image sets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and transmits simplified copies of quality assessment data in metadata format rather than transmitting full-resolution images. These metadata copies contain all necessary quality information in compact form, reducing transmission bandwidth requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Quantity of substance

If the system stores only high-quality images with quality thresholds, then the storage efficiency improves, but the complexity of quality assessment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacity utilizationVSAvoidquality assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors changes in quality parameters (sharpness, focus metrics) within metadata and triggers storage decisions based on threshold comparisons. This parameter-based approach simplifies the complexity by reducing quality assessment to straightforward numerical comparisons rather than complex image analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230236611A1Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Sensor Activation and Correlation System
Publication Date: 2023.07.27 SKYDIO INC
  • US20230236611A1 patent drawing
  • US20230236611A1 patent drawing
  • US20230236611A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) logs first UAV information at a first frequency. The UAV triggers a camera associated with the UAV to capture an image. In response to triggering the camera to capture the image, the UAV logs second UAV information at a second frequency that is higher than the first frequency. A device that is separate from the UAV identifies a location of the UAV corresponding to the image based on a capture timestamp of the image received from the camera, the first UAV information, and the second UAV information. The device generates a geo-rectified imagery based on the image and the location of the UAV.