UAV Flight Control with Obstacle Detection and Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The widespread use of drones in urban areas poses safety risks due to unauthorized entry, airborne collisions, and adverse weather conditions, necessitating advanced control systems to ensure public safety.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that operates in autonomous, hover, and remote-control modes, utilizing a main controller with object detection and decision processors, combined with sensors like cameras and GPS, to adjust course, hover, and receive flight control commands, ensuring safe operation and communication through cellular modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UAV operates in autonomous mode with object detection and course adjustment, then safety is improved by avoiding obstacles, but device complexity increases due to multiple processors and sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: an object detection processor that analyzes sensor data to identify obstacles, a decision processor that determines course adjustments, and a main controller that coordinates overall UAV operation. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving safety through dedicated functionality while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary object detection and analysis before the UAV reaches potential collision points. The object detection processor continuously scans the environment ahead of time, and the decision processor pre-calculates course adjustments based on detected objects, allowing the UAV to proactively avoid obstacles rather than reactively responding to imminent threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the UAV enters hover mode upon detecting override conditions, then public safety is protected by preventing unauthorized entry, but loss of time occurs during mode transition and hovering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublic safetyVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary anti-action by detecting override conditions (such as unauthorized entry into restricted zones) before the UAV can complete harmful actions. When such conditions are detected, the system immediately initiates hover mode or returns to the home location, preventing the unauthorized entry from occurring in the first place. This proactive safety mechanism prioritizes preventing harm over maintaining mission continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the UAV transitions between multiple operational modes (autonomous, hover, remote-control), then adaptability is improved for different operational scenarios, but device complexity increases due to mode management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UAV implements dynamic mode transitions that allow it to adapt its operational characteristics in real-time based on detected conditions. The system can smoothly transition between autonomous mode (for normal operation), hover mode (for safety interventions), and remote-control mode (for manual intervention). This dynamic adaptability is managed through a centralized control architecture that coordinates mode changes without requiring complex reconfiguration of individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The main controller serves multiple functions across different operational modes, coordinating object detection, course adjustment, hover control, and remote-command reception within a single integrated system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems for each mode, managing complexity through universal components that adapt their behavior based on the current operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11591088B2Method and system for controlling an unmanned aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 UAVTRAK LLC
  • US11591088B2 patent drawing
  • US11591088B2 patent drawing
  • US11591088B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided. An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is operated. A position of the UAV is determined while in flight, and a nonce is generated. A Merkel root is generated based at least in part on a timestamp and the position of the UAV. A current block is calculated based at least in part on a previous block, the Merkel root, and the nonce, and the current block, the timestamp, the nonce, the prior block, and the position of the UAV are transmitted.