UAV Multi-Pattern Landing Control for GPS-Free Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) landing systems lack precision, particularly in environments with limited visibility or complex terrain, and often rely on expensive equipment, such as GPS, which may not function effectively in all conditions.

Innovation Solution

A multi-pattern recognition system using a camera sensor to identify coded control information for precise landing, employing a combination of larger and smaller patterns positioned around the landing area, with the ability to adjust posture based on pattern size differences and perform low-altitude flights for recognition if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If GPS or expensive equipment is used for landing, then landing precision is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding precisionVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of GPS functionality by using visual patterns on the ground that the UAV's camera can detect and decode. Instead of relying on expensive satellite navigation hardware, the system projects landing information through coded ground patterns that the camera captures and processes, achieving precise landing guidance without expensive equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, complex landing systems with simple, inexpensive components: a camera sensor (already present in most modern UAVs), ground-based pattern markers, and image processing algorithms. This substitution uses low-cost objects to achieve the same functional outcome as expensive specialized equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Device complexity

If single-pattern recognition is used, then system complexity is reduced, but landing reliability deteriorates in limited visibility or complex terrain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidlanding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the landing guidance function into multiple independent pattern elements (first pattern, second pattern, third pattern) with different characteristics. Each pattern can be independently recognized, and their combined information provides robust landing guidance that works in various visibility conditions and terrains, preventing single-point failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent varies key parameters of the recognition patterns including size (large vs. small patterns), position (different locations around the landing area), and coding information (different data encoded in each pattern). This parameter diversity enables the system to maintain reliability across different environmental conditions by selecting appropriate patterns for each situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multi-pattern recognition system is implemented, then landing reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the camera sensor perform multiple functions: it captures images for navigation, detects landing patterns, decodes control information, and provides feedback for posture adjustment. By making the existing camera multi-functional rather than adding separate specialized sensors, the system achieves high reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple pattern recognition functions into a unified image processing system. The same camera and processing pipeline handle detection of multiple patterns, decoding of various control information, and generation of landing guidance, reducing overall system complexity compared to having separate systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If precise landing control is achieved, then landing accuracy is improved, but adaptability to various environmental conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding accuracyVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability by allowing the UAV to adjust its recognition strategy based on environmental conditions. The system can switch between recognizing different pattern sizes, adjust recognition thresholds, and select appropriate patterns based on visibility and terrain, maintaining precise landing control across varying environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11485516B2Precise landing method of unmanned aerial robot using multi-pattern in unmanned aerial control system and apparatus therefor
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11485516B2 patent drawing
  • US11485516B2 patent drawing
  • US11485516B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a precise landing method using a multi-pattern in an unmanned aerial control system and an apparatus therefor. In an aspect of the present invention, a precise landing method using a multi-pattern of an unmanned aerial robot in an unmanned aerial control system includes receiving an image value from an outside and recognizing a multi-pattern in which control information for precise landing control has been coded based on the image value, obtaining control information when an ID value included in the control information indicates a landing point, moving to the landing point based on the control information, and performing landing at the landing point, and recognizing the multi-pattern again if the landing is not completed. A landing area for the landing of the unmanned aerial robot may include the landing point and the multi-pattern. The multi-pattern may include a first multi-pattern and a second multi-pattern. The first multi-pattern may have a greater size than the second multi-pattern.