Automated UAV Perimeter Guarding System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current UAV systems lack an efficient method for guarding perimeters against infiltration, particularly in identifying and tracking unauthorized or hostile agents in real-time, and providing effective neutralization data.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a multi-purpose UAV deployment system with automated launchers and control centers that deploy ready-to-launch UAVs to search and identify infiltration agents, providing real-time data for neutralization, and potentially supplementing or taking over identification and tracking tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual UAV deployment methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but response time and productivity in guarding perimeters deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

UAVs are pre-positioned in ready-to-launch containers at strategic locations along the perimeter. The automated launcher systems are pre-configured with multiple UAVs, so when infiltration is detected, deployment occurs immediately without manual intervention or preparation time, significantly reducing response time while the automated system handles the complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated launcher system autonomously detects infiltration attempts through integrated sensors, selects appropriate UAVs from containers, launches them, and recovers them after mission completion. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual operator intervention throughout the entire process, improving productivity while the system manages its own complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple UAVs are deployed simultaneously, then surveillance coverage and detection capability improve, but device complexity and coordination difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurveillance coverageVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control center receives real-time data from multiple UAVs, infiltration detection sensors, and environmental sensors. This feedback loop enables the system to dynamically coordinate UAV positions and missions, maintain optimal surveillance coverage, and adjust deployments based on detected threats, ensuring reliable multi-UAV operation without overwhelming complexity through intelligent centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The perimeter is divided into multiple zones with dedicated UAV containers and sensors at each location. Each zone operates semi-independently with its own launcher and sensor array, allowing multiple UAVs to be deployed simultaneously across different segments without requiring complex end-to-end coordination, as each segment manages its own UAVs locally while reporting to the central control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If automated launcher systems are implemented, then deployment speed and response time improve, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The automated launcher system is designed as a universal platform that can deploy multiple types of UAVs (fixed-wing, rotary-wing, VTOL) from standardized containers. The launcher hardware and control software are configured to handle various UAV configurations, enabling rapid deployment of appropriate UAV types based on threat assessment while simplifying manufacturing through standardized multi-functional components rather than specialized single-purpose systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs disposable or easily replaceable UAVs launched from automated containers. Rather than investing in extremely complex, highly sophisticated individual UAVs, the system uses simpler, lower-cost UAVs that can be rapidly manufactured and replaced. The automated launcher provides the high-speed deployment capability, while the UAVs themselves are designed for cost-effective production and replacement after mission completion or failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentEP2490940B1UAV system and method
Publication Date: 2021.06.30 ISRAEL AEROSPACE IND LTD
  • EP2490940B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2490940B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2490940B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system is provided for guarding a perimeter, including a control center, a launch system, a controller and a communication system. The control center is configured for generating a control signal responsive to receiving infiltration information of an actual or suspected infiltration at a target zone associated with the perimeter by one or more infiltration agents. The launch system is configured for deploying one or more ready-to-launch UAV's to the target zone responsive to receiving the control signal from the control center. The controller is configured for operating the launched UAV(s) to home onto at least one such infiltration agent. The controller is also configured for identifying the nature of the infiltration agent or the nature of infiltration; and/or for tracking the infiltration agent via the UAV(s). The communication system is configured for providing data corresponding to the nature of the infiltration agent or the nature of infiltration, and/or for providing location data corresponding to the location of the infiltration agent being tracked by the UAV's to enable neutralization thereof. A corresponding method for guarding a perimeter is also provided.