Dynamic UAV Re-Route Interface for Conflict-Free Flight Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges in dynamically re-routing around unexpected conflicts during flights, as human operators may lack time or expertise to manually select conflict-free routes, potentially leading to secondary conflicts and the need for collision avoidance systems.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic re-routing unit within an unmanned traffic management (UTM) network identifies and presents multiple alternate flight plans to the operator, considering factors like risk, time, and cost, allowing for real-time adjustments to avoid conflicts and minimize secondary issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a human operator manually re-routes a drone around a conflict, then the drone can avoid the conflict, but the operator may not have sufficient time to determine a new route and may lack expertise to ensure the new route is conflict-free

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconflict avoidance reliabilityVSAvoidtime for manual route determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated re-routing system that acts as an intermediary between the conflict detection mechanism and the drone's flight control. This intermediary automatically generates and evaluates multiple alternative routes, presenting them to the operator for selection, thereby eliminating the time constraint and expertise requirement for manual route determination while maintaining reliability through automated conflict checking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating multiple alternative routes before the operator needs to make a decision. When a conflict is detected, the system has already prepared several viable alternative paths with evaluated metrics, allowing the operator to simply select from pre-prepared options rather than determining a new route from scratch under time pressure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If multiple alternate routes are presented to the operator for selection, then the operator can choose a preferred route, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator ability to select preferred routeVSAvoidre-routing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex re-routing task into distinct modular components: conflict detection module, route generation module, route evaluation module, and route presentation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the re-routing process, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable despite the increased functionality required to present multiple alternate routes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes to manage complexity by evaluating and ranking alternative routes based on multiple parameters such as flight time, distance, fuel consumption, and safety margins. By changing and comparing these parameters systematically, the system can present a manageable number of optimized alternatives to the operator without requiring the operator to evaluate all possible routes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4116956B1Systems and methods for a dynamic re-route interface
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLC
  • EP4116956B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4116956B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4116956B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method may include detecting (400), during a flight of an aircraft system, a conflict with a planned route of the aircraft system, determining (402) one or more alternate routes for the aircraft system to avoid the conflict, wherein each of the one or more alternate routes avoid secondary conflicts with active flight operations, transmitting (412) first data to cause first visual information indicating the conflict and second visual information indicating the one or more alternate routes to be displayed to a user, receiving (414) second data indicating one of the one or more alternate routes being selected by the user, and updating (416) the planned route of the aircraft system to include the alternate route selected by the user.