UAV Flight Routing Using Noise Exposure Maps Across Neighborhoods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) pose increasing noise exposure challenges in populated areas, with existing solutions failing to effectively distribute and mitigate noise impacts across neighborhoods, leading to disproportionate noise exposure for certain properties.

Innovation Solution

A noise mitigation system that maintains a noise exposure database and uses a flight routing subsystem to generate new flight paths that load level noise exposures by considering noise-sensitive and noise-insensitive properties, adjusting flight altitudes, routes, and employing active noise cancellation techniques to distribute noise more evenly across a neighborhood.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If UAVs operate over populated areas to provide services, then productivity and service coverage are improved, but noise exposure to properties increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidnoise exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different noise mitigation strategies to different properties based on their noise sensitivity characteristics. Noise-sensitive properties receive priority routing avoidance, while noise-insensitive properties tolerate higher noise exposure, enabling differentiated local quality management across the service area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system dynamically adjusts flight paths in real-time based on current noise exposure levels, weather conditions, and property sensitivity data. This dynamic optimization allows the system to maintain productivity while adapting noise mitigation strategies to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If flight routes are concentrated over certain properties, then operational efficiency is improved, but noise exposure becomes disproportionate for those properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddisproportionate noise exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors cumulative noise exposure for each property and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust routing decisions. When a property approaches its noise threshold, the system automatically redistributes flights to alternative properties, preventing disproportionate noise accumulation while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates noise exposure thresholds for each property based on their sensitivity characteristics and establishes routing rules in advance. This preliminary action enables proactive noise management before disproportionate exposure occurs, allowing efficient operations to continue within acceptable limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If traditional routing methods are used, then device complexity is minimized, but noise mitigation effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting system complexityVSAvoidnoise mitigation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a centralized routing server as an intermediary that processes flight requests and generates optimized routes. This intermediary layer handles the complex noise mitigation calculations centrally, keeping individual UAV controllers simple while achieving effective noise distribution across the fleet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces noise impact on sensitive properties by distributing noise exposure events, minimizing disruptions and complaints, while ensuring UAV operations are efficient and reliable.

Implementation Method 1

a noise mitigation system that maintains a noise exposure database and uses a flight routing subsystem to generate new flight paths that load level noise exposures by considering noise-sensitive and noise-insensitive properties, adjusting flight altitudes, routes, and employing active noise cancellation techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActive noise cancellation: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentEP3701343B1Mitigating noise exposure to unmanned aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.10.27 WING AVIATION LLC
  • EP3701343B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3701343B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3701343B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computer implemented method of distributing noise exposures to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) over a neighborhood includes: receiving flight routing requests to fly the UAVs over the neighborhood; accessing a noise exposure map stored in a noise exposure database in response to the flight routing requests; and generating new flight paths for the UAVs over the neighborhood that load level additional noise exposures that the new flight paths will contribute to the noise exposure map. The noise exposure map includes noise exposure values indexed to properties within the neighborhood. The noise exposure values quantify cumulative noise exposures of the properties due to historical flight paths of the UAVs over the neighborhood.