UAV Operation Disruption Through Selective Unit Malfunction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing counter-UAV technologies are not suitable for urban environments or airports due to risks of collateral damage, and there is a need for an efficient method to disrupt UAV operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for inducing disruption to UAV operations by transmitting disrupting commands that cause specific units of the UAV to malfunction, including communication units, controllers, sensors, and power supplies, thereby preventing mission completion or altering flight patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radar detection, RF jamming, or kinetic mitigation technologies are deployed to counter UAVs, then UAV detection and disruption capability is improved, but risk of collateral damage increases in urban environments or airports

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUAV disruption capabilityVSAvoidcollateral damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the UAV system into specific functional units (communication unit, controller, sensor unit, power supply unit) and targets individual units for disruption. This selective targeting allows disruption of UAV operations without affecting surrounding areas, thereby reducing collateral damage while maintaining disruption effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by transmitting disrupting commands through communication channels to the UAV's own systems, rather than using direct kinetic or electromagnetic interference. This intermediary method allows precise control over which UAV units are affected, minimizing harmful effects on surrounding environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If disrupting commands are transmitted to cause specific units of UAV to malfunction, then precision of disruption is improved, but complexity of disruption system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisruption precisionVSAvoiddisruption system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The disrupting system is designed with multi-functionality, capable of transmitting different types of disrupting commands targeting various UAV units (communication, controller, sensor, power supply) through a single integrated platform. This universal design achieves high disruption precision without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves precision by changing parameters of the disrupting commands (such as command type, transmission timing, frequency) rather than complicating the hardware architecture. Different command parameters target different UAV units, enabling precise disruption control through software-level parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12425123B2Disruption to an operation of an unmanned aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 D FEND SOLUTIONS AD LTD
  • US12425123B2 patent drawing
  • US12425123B2 patent drawing
  • US12425123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There may be provided a method for inducing a disruption to an operation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that communicates with a remote controller, said method may include determining to induce the disruption to the operation of the UAV; and transmitting, to the UAV, one or more disrupting commands that once executed by the at UAV causes a unit of the UAV to malfunction, the malfunction induces the disruption to the operation of the UAV.