UAV Swarm Formation Control for Dynamic Target Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for controlling UAV swarms face challenges in dynamic control due to unpredictability in target movement and maintaining formation, requiring complex computer vision techniques and manual control efforts.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for UAV swarm control involving a Ground Control Station (GCS) that determines formation information based on the leader UAV's geo-location and user requests, transmitting this information directly to follower UAVs to adjust positions automatically, eliminating the need for manual control and ensuring accurate formation maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional pre-defined mission or path planning techniques are used for UAV swarm control, then the control system is simpler to implement, but the system cannot dynamically adapt to unpredictable target movement and maintain accurate formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a leader UAV that performs computer vision processing and multiple follower UAVs that execute positioning based on received formation information. This segmentation allows the complex adaptive control functionality to be concentrated in the leader while followers use simpler control logic, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The leader UAV acts as an intermediary between the environment (target object) and the follower UAVs. It processes visual information and transmits formation information to followers, enabling dynamic adaptation without requiring each follower to independently process complex visual data, thus maintaining accuracy while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If computer vision techniques are implemented for dynamic target tracking, then the system can adapt to target movement, but the cost and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget movement adaptationVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computer vision processing workload is segmented and concentrated exclusively in the leader UAV, which has dedicated processing capabilities. Follower UAVs receive pre-processed formation information and execute positioning without performing complex vision tasks, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining adaptation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The leader UAV creates a simplified representation of the target position and formation requirements, copying only the essential navigation data to follower UAVs. This allows followers to achieve accurate tracking without replicating the full computer vision processing chain, reducing computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If manual control is used to maintain UAV formation, then the system is easier to implement, but significant manual effort and time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation easeVSAvoidmanual control time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The follower UAVs operate in a self-service mode by automatically receiving formation information from the leader and autonomously adjusting their positions based on this information. This eliminates the need for continuous manual control input while maintaining formation accuracy, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The leader UAV performs preliminary processing of formation information and transmits it to followers in advance, enabling followers to automatically execute positioning without requiring real-time manual intervention. This preliminary action reduces manual control time while maintaining ease of implementation through automated routines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If direct transmission of formation information from GCS to each follower UAV is implemented, then positioning accuracy is improved, but communication infrastructure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication architecture is segmented into direct point-to-point links from GCS to each follower UAV, avoiding complex multi-hop routing. This direct transmission approach improves positioning accuracy by reducing communication delays and intermediate processing, while the modular nature of direct links keeps infrastructure complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4363941B1Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm control
Publication Date: 2025.09.24 SONY GROUP CORP
  • EP4363941B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4363941B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4363941B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and a system for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm control is provided. The system includes a plurality of UAVs including a leader UAV and a plurality of follower UAVs communicably coupled with the leader UAV. The system further includes a Ground Control Station (GCS). The GCS determines a geo-location of the leader UAV and determines formation information based on the geo-location. The formation information indicates a relative position for each follower UAV with respect to the leader UAV. The GCS further transmits the formation information directly to each of the leader UAV and the plurality of follower UAVs. Each follower UAV receives the formation information and adjusts a position based on the formation information.