UAV Testing With Guide-Rail Motion for Realistic Hardware Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing testing methods for electronic devices, particularly unmanned aerial vehicles, are inadequate as they often rely on emulators or simulators that do not accurately replicate the hardware and environmental conditions, leading to inefficiencies and the need for extensive outdoor testing, which is time-consuming and costly.

Innovation Solution

A testing apparatus comprising a guide rail, carriage, actuator, and computing device that simulates real-world conditions by moving and positioning the device to test hardware and software performance, including camera calibration and velocity estimation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If emulators are used to test the product, then testing can be performed without physical hardware, but the testing speed is significantly slower due to interpretation or translation overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting setup easeVSAvoidtesting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a physical copy (test device) of the actual product hardware rather than a virtual emulator. The test device replicates the hardware architecture and operates natively, providing both the ease of standardized testing setup and the speed of native execution, resolving the contradiction between testing convenience and testing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If simulators are used to replicate software, then software testing can be performed, but hardware behavior and environmental conditions are not accurately replicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware testing capabilityVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges software testing with actual hardware execution by running the software application directly on the physical test device rather than in a separate simulator environment. This combination ensures that both software functionality and hardware behavior are tested together under realistic conditions, resolving the contradiction between software testing capability and testing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If outdoor test ranges are used to test flight operations, then realistic flight conditions can be tested, but the testing process becomes time-consuming and requires extensive space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight condition realismVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from three-dimensional outdoor flight testing to a controlled indoor environment using a mechanical positioning system with guide rails and carriages. This dimensional change allows realistic flight condition simulation (including motion, orientation, and environmental factors) to be achieved in a compact indoor space, resolving the contradiction between testing realism and testing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive device testing is performed including camera calibration and velocity estimation, then product performance can be thoroughly evaluated, but the testing complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test device uses its own sensors and processing capabilities to perform self-testing and self-calibration functions. The device executes software applications that test its hardware components, including camera calibration and velocity estimation, using its built-in sensors and processors. This self-service approach enables comprehensive performance evaluation without requiring additional external testing equipment, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12387483B2Systems, methods, and apparatus for testing UAV devices
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 WING AVIATION LLC
  • US12387483B2 patent drawing
  • US12387483B2 patent drawing
  • US12387483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatus, and methods are presented for testing a device. One method includes activating an actuator device to cause a carriage, coupled to a device, to be moved in one or more directions along a guide rail, wherein the device includes at least one processing device and one or more sensor devices. The method may also comprise receiving, by the device, one or more input commands and executing, by the device based on the one or more input commands, a software application to generate an output while the device is moving in the one or more directions. Further, the method may comprise verifying the execution of the software application on the device based on the output.