UAV Tether Winch Control Using Motor Feedback for User Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems lack efficient mechanisms for user interaction and feedback during payload delivery and retrieval operations, particularly in controlling the tether winch system.

Innovation Solution

The UAV's control system determines operational parameters of the winch motor to detect intentional user interactions with the tether, and based on these interactions, it determines a motor response process to control the tether for interaction with the user and provide feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the UAV uses a motorized winch system for payload delivery and retrieval, then the productivity and efficiency of payload operations are improved, but the device complexity increases due to the need for motor control systems and sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload delivery and retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidwinch system control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors operational parameters of the motor (current, voltage, speed) and uses this feedback to detect user interactions. The system adjusts motor commands in real-time based on detected interactions, creating a closed-loop control system that manages complexity through intelligent response rather than additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The motor control system automatically detects user interactions by analyzing its own operational parameters without requiring separate sensors or user input devices. The system self-regulates by interpreting motor current and speed variations as user intent, eliminating the need for additional control interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If the control system continuously monitors motor operational parameters to detect user interactions, then the ease of operation is improved through intuitive tether-based control, but the use of energy increases due to continuous monitoring and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction with tetherVSAvoidcontrol system energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system monitors motor parameters continuously but only processes and responds to significant deviations that indicate intentional user interactions. Normal operational variations are filtered out, allowing the system to maintain energy efficiency while still providing responsive control when users actually interact with the tether

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its monitoring threshold and response sensitivity based on the operational state. During normal operation, monitoring is less intensive to conserve energy, while detection sensitivity increases when interaction patterns suggest user intent, optimizing the balance between ease of operation and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the motor response process is used to provide feedback to the user through tether control, then the reliability of user interaction is improved, but the device complexity increases due to the need for response determination logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction reliabilityVSAvoidmotor response control logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical feedback mechanisms (such as springs, dampers, or mechanical linkages) with electronic control logic that analyzes motor operational parameters. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while maintaining or improving reliability through software-based interaction detection and response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3943389B1Methods and systems for user interaction and feedback via control of tether
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 WING AVIATION LLC
  • EP3943389B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3943389B1 patent drawingFigure 1B~1C
  • EP3943389B1 patent drawingFigure 1D

AI summary

Described herein are methods and systems for motorized control of a tether, such as for purposes of user interaction and feedback. In particular, a UAV's control system may determine one or more operational parameters of a motor for a winch disposed in the UAV, the winch including the tether and a spool. The control system may then detect in the one or more operational parameters, an operational pattern of the motor that is indicative of an intentional user-interaction with the tether. Based on the detected operational pattern of the motor that is indicative of the intentional user-interaction with the tether, the control system may determine a motor response process. Then, the control system may operate the motor in accordance with the determined motor response process.