UAV Winch Control Using Flight-Mode Switching to Dampen Payload Swing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges in damping oscillations of payloads coupled to tethers during winch operations, which can lead to instability and inefficiency in payload delivery and retrieval processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a winch system with a control system that switches between hover flight mode and forward flight mode to induce drag or reduces flight stabilization along specific dimensions, or selects damping routines to dissipate energy and dampen oscillations of the payload during tether retraction or deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the UAV operates in hover flight mode with full flight stabilization, then the payload can be precisely positioned, but oscillations of the payload increase due to tether dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload positioning precisionVSAvoidpayload oscillation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the extent of flight stabilization along different dimensions based on operational phase. During payload delivery, full stabilization is maintained. During tether retraction, stabilization is reduced along dimensions where oscillations occur, allowing energy dissipation through controlled UAV movement while maintaining stabilization along critical positioning dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the stabilization parameter by switching between hover flight mode (full stabilization) and forward flight mode (reduced stabilization). This parameter change allows the system to transition between precise positioning and oscillation damping states as needed during different phases of payload delivery and retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the UAV switches to forward flight mode to induce drag on the payload, then oscillations are dampened, but payload positioning precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload oscillation dampingVSAvoidpayload positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system employs periodic switching between hover flight mode and forward flight mode during tether retraction. This periodic action creates alternating phases of oscillation damping (forward flight) and positioning correction (hover flight), ultimately achieving both oscillation reduction and precise positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically transitions between different flight modes based on real-time oscillation detection and operational phase. The control system monitors payload oscillations and adjusts stabilization extent accordingly, switching to forward flight mode when oscillations are detected and returning to hover flight mode for positioning adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If flight stabilization is reduced to dampen oscillations, then energy is dissipated effectively, but system control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy dissipation for oscillation dampingVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor payload oscillations and automatically adjust the extent of flight stabilization. Sensors detect oscillation amplitude and frequency, and the control system responds by modifying UAV flight mode and stabilization parameters, creating a closed-loop control system that manages complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own flight capabilities to dampen oscillations rather than requiring separate damping mechanisms. By utilizing controlled forward flight and drag generation, the UAV serves its dual purpose of both positioning the payload and dampening oscillations, reducing the need for additional complex damping devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If the UAV maintains hover flight mode during tether retraction, then payload positioning is maintained, but oscillations persist and reduce operational efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload position maintenanceVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between hover flight mode and forward flight mode during tether retraction based on oscillation detection. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain positioning precision when needed while actively dampening oscillations to improve operational efficiency, achieving both goals through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic transitions between hover flight and forward flight modes during tether retraction. These periodic actions create cycles of oscillation damping followed by positioning maintenance, ultimately achieving both efficient oscillation reduction and accurate payload delivery without requiring continuous hover flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively stabilizes the payload, ensuring smooth and efficient delivery and retrieval operations by reducing oscillations and maintaining system stability, even when the tether is partially unwound.

Implementation Method 1

switch to a forward flight mode in which movement of the UAV results in drag on the payload, thereby damping the oscillations due to the drag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

reduce an extent of flight stabilization along at least one dimension, thereby resulting in damping of the detected oscillations due to energy dissipation during movement of the UAV along the at least one dimension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation: Viscous Damping

Data Source

PatentUS11260963B2Methods and systems for damping oscillations of a payload
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 WING AVIATION LLC
  • US11260963B2 patent drawing
  • US11260963B2 patent drawing
  • US11260963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are methods and systems to dampen oscillations of a payload coupled to a tether of a winch system arranged on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). For example, the UAV's control system may dampen the oscillations by causing the UAV to switch to a forward flight mode in which movement of the UAV results in drag on the payload, thereby damping the oscillations. In another example, the control system may cause the UAV to reduce an extent flight stabilization along at least one dimension, thereby resulting in damping of the detected oscillations due to energy dissipation during movement of the UAV along the dimension. In this way, the control system could select and carry out one or more such techniques, and could do so during retraction and/or deployment of the tether.