Motorized UAV Tether Control Through Winch Interaction Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) lack effective methods for user interaction and feedback mechanisms, particularly in controlling the tether for payload delivery and retrieval, which can lead to inefficiencies and potential damage during operations.

Innovation Solution

A control system that determines operational parameters of a motor for a winch in a UAV, detects intentional user interactions with the tether, and adjusts the motor response process to facilitate interaction and provide feedback to the user, allowing for controlled winding and unwinding of the tether.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the motor operates at high speed for rapid tether deployment, then productivity is improved, but the tether may become tangled or damaged due to lack of user control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetether deployment speedVSAvoidtether control safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors motor operational parameters (current, speed, torque) in real-time and uses this feedback to detect user interaction patterns. When user interaction is detected, the control system adjusts motor behavior accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that balances automated high-speed operation with user-controlled safety interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The motor control system dynamically adjusts its operational characteristics based on detected user interactions. The system transitions between different operational modes (autonomous high-speed deployment vs. user-controlled operation) by modifying motor parameters in real-time, allowing the system to adapt its behavior to current operational needs and user intentions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the motor provides strong force for rapid payload retrieval, then productivity is improved, but user interaction becomes difficult due to high tension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload retrieval speedVSAvoiduser interaction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The motor applies partial force during normal operation, providing enough tension to maintain control and enable user interaction, but not full force required for maximum-speed retrieval. When user interaction is detected and retrieval is initiated, the system transitions to excessive action by applying full motor force to rapidly retrieve the payload, exceeding normal operational force levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The motor control system automatically detects user interaction patterns through monitoring operational parameters and autonomously initiates the retrieval sequence without requiring explicit user commands. The system serves itself by interpreting motor load variations and tension changes as user intent, eliminating the need for separate control inputs from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the control system continuously monitors motor parameters for user interaction, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction detectionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing motor control system, originally designed for basic tether winching, is enhanced to perform multiple functions: it continues to control motor operation while simultaneously monitoring operational parameters for user interaction detection. The same hardware infrastructure (motor, sensors, control unit) serves dual purposes, eliminating the need for separate dedicated detection systems and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system monitors its own operational parameters (current, speed, torque) to detect user interactions, using self-generated data rather than requiring external sensing systems. The motor control unit analyzes variations in its own operational characteristics to infer user actions, allowing the system to serve its own monitoring needs without additional dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11905018B2Methods and systems for user interaction and feedback via control of tether
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 WING AVIATION LLC
  • US11905018B2 patent drawing
  • US11905018B2 patent drawing
  • US11905018B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are methods and systems for motorized control of a tether, such as for purposes of user interaction and feedback. In particular, a UAV's control system may determine one or more operational parameters of a motor for a winch disposed in the UAV, the winch including the tether and a spool. The control system may then detect in the one or more operational parameters, an operational pattern of the motor that is indicative of an intentional user-interaction with the tether. Based on the detected operational pattern of the motor that is indicative of the intentional user-interaction with the tether, the control system may determine a motor response process. Then, the control system may operate the motor in accordance with the determined motor response process.