UAV Winch Tether Control for Intentional User Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems lack efficient mechanisms for user interaction and feedback during payload delivery and retrieval, particularly in managing the winch system to control the tether, which can lead to unintended operation or damage.

Innovation Solution

A control system is implemented in the UAV to determine operational parameters of the winch motor, detect intentional user interactions, and respond accordingly by adjusting the motor response process to interact with the user and provide feedback, ensuring safe and controlled operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the winch system is made accessible for manual operation, then user interaction capability is improved, but the risk of unintended operation and damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction capabilityVSAvoidrisk of unintended operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors motor operational parameters (current, voltage, speed) and uses this feedback to detect intentional user interactions. The control system adjusts motor response in real-time based on detected interaction patterns, enabling safe manual operation while preventing unintended damage through active monitoring and adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The motor control system dynamically adapts its response characteristics based on detected operational patterns. When intentional user interaction is detected, the system transitions from a protected state to an interactive state, adjusting motor impedance and response thresholds to enable safe manual manipulation of the tether while maintaining protection against unintended operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the motor control system continuously monitors operational parameters for user interaction, then interaction detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction detection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor's own operational parameters (current draw, voltage consumption, speed variations) serve as the sensing mechanism for detecting user interactions. The control system analyzes these self-generated signals to identify interaction patterns, eliminating the need for separate sensors and reducing system complexity while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects user interactions by monitoring changes in motor operational parameters such as current draw, voltage consumption, and rotational speed. By analyzing variations in these parameters over time, the system can distinguish between intentional user interactions and normal operational variations without requiring additional sensing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3509949B1Methods and systems for user interaction and feedback via control of tether
Publication Date: 2021.11.03 WING AVIATION LLC
  • EP3509949B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3509949B1 patent drawingFigure 1B~1C
  • EP3509949B1 patent drawingFigure 1D

AI summary

Described herein are methods and systems for motorized control of a tether, such as for purposes of user interaction and feedback. In particular, a UAV's control system may determine one or more operational parameters of a motor for a winch disposed in the UAV, the winch including the tether and a spool. The control system may then detect in the one or more operational parameters, an operational pattern of the motor that is indicative of an intentional user-interaction with the tether. Based on the detected operational pattern of the motor that is indicative of the intentional user-interaction with the tether, the control system may determine a motor response process. Then, the control system may operate the motor in accordance with the determined motor response process.