UCI Multiplexing in PUSCH for NR User Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing technologies for multiplexing Uplink Control Information (UCI) in Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) in New Radio (NR) access technology face challenges in efficiently handling UCI bits generated before and after an Uplink grant, leading to resource management issues and suboptimal system performance.

Innovation Solution

A method where UCI bits are processed and transmitted based on the comparison of UCI bits generated before and after the Uplink grant, using a UCI multiplexing rule that adjusts the number of bits according to the Downlink assignment indicators and configured coding rates, allowing for efficient bundling and compression to optimize resource utilization in PUSCH.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If UCI bits from both before and after UL grant are multiplexed in PUSCH, then user throughput and system performance improve, but resource management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser throughputVSAvoidresource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource management by comparing the number of UCI bits (M from before UL grant, N from after UL grant) with the maximum capacity (Q) and adjusting the multiplexing strategy accordingly. The system dynamically determines whether to multiplex all bits, truncate, or prioritize certain bits based on real-time resource availability, thereby improving throughput while managing complexity through adaptive decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of UCI bit handling by introducing configurable parameters M, N, P, and Q that define the number of bits from different time periods and the maximum capacity. By comparing these parameters and adjusting the multiplexing behavior based on their values, the system optimizes resource utilization while maintaining manageable complexity through parameter-driven control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If UCI bits are multiplexed in PUSCH, then system performance improves, but the number of bits may exceed maximum capacity leading to loss of information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidUCI bits loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively multiplexing UCI bits based on capacity constraints. When the total bits (M+N) exceed the maximum capacity Q, the system performs partial multiplexing by prioritizing certain bits or truncating others according to predefined rules, ensuring that the most critical information is preserved while accepting some information loss to maintain system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter comparison (M, N, P, Q) to dynamically adjust the multiplexing behavior. By changing the effective number of bits transmitted based on the relationship between these parameters, the system optimizes the balance between transmitting as much information as possible and staying within capacity limits to prevent information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If UCI bits from DL assignments after UL grant are included, then resource utilization improves, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining the rules for handling UCI bits from DL assignments before and after the UL grant. The system establishes beforehand the comparison logic for parameters M, N, P, and Q, and the multiplexing strategies to apply in different scenarios. This preliminary setup reduces processing complexity during actual operation by avoiding ad-hoc decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic processing by adjusting the handling of UCI bits based on the timing relationship with the UL grant and the capacity constraints. The system dynamically determines which bits to process, prioritize, or truncate based on real-time parameter comparisons, optimizing resource utilization while managing processing complexity through adaptive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12127207B2User equipment, base station and wireless communication method
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA
  • US12127207B2 patent drawing
  • US12127207B2 patent drawing
  • US12127207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a user equipment, base station and wireless communication methods related to multiplexing of UCI in PUSCH in NR. A user equipment comprises: circuitry operative to process UCI bits to be transmitted according to the comparison of the number M of UCI bits generated based on DL assignment(s) before an UL grant from a base station and the number N of UCI bits generated based on DL assignment(s) after the UL grant with the number P of UCI bits indicated in the UL grant and/or the maximum number Q of bits determined based on at least a configured coding rate, wherein each of M, N, P, Q is an integer equal to or larger than 0; and a transmitter operative to transmit the processed UCI bits in PUSCH at a TTI indicated in the UL grant to the base station.