UCI Piggybacking in Cross-Carrier Scheduling Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, particularly in scenarios involving Dynamic Spectrum Sharing (DSS) and Unlicensed Spectrum, the existing mechanisms for piggybacking Uplink Control Information (UCI) onto Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) are inefficient, as they rely on a Primary Cell (PCell) for robustness, limiting the performance when a Secondary Cell (SCell) is capable of scheduling a PCell.

Innovation Solution

A method where a first node transmits a first signal in a first cell and a second signal in a second cell, with the second cell capable of scheduling a target cell incorporating UCI, and the first cell transmitting UCI when the second cell is not capable, ensuring stable UCI performance by prioritizing the SCell with the smallest serving cell identity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the terminal preferentially chooses the PUSCH transmitted on the PCell for piggybacking the UCI, then the UCI transmission reliability is improved, but the UCI piggybacking performance is limited when the SCell is capable of scheduling the PCell

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUCI transmission reliabilityVSAvoidUCI piggybacking performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic selection mechanism for UCI piggybacking that adapts based on scheduling capability. When an SCell is capable of scheduling the PCell, the terminal dynamically switches to use the SCell's PUSCH for UCI piggybacking instead of always using the PCell. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to achieve both high reliability (when PCell schedules) and high productivity (when SCell schedules), optimizing UCI transmission performance based on real-time scheduling conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If an SCell is capable of scheduling a PCell, then the scheduling flexibility is improved, but the existing UCI piggybacking mechanism becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidUCI piggybacking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameter for UCI piggybacking from a static preference for PCell to a dynamic parameter based on scheduling capability. The terminal evaluates whether the SCell can schedule the PCell and adjusts the piggybacking cell selection accordingly. This parameter change enables the system to leverage SCell scheduling flexibility while maintaining an efficient, adapted UCI piggybacking mechanism that works optimally in both PCell-self-scheduling and SCell-cross-scheduling scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12127203B2Method and device in nodes used for wireless communication
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 APOGEE NETWORKS LLC
  • US12127203B2 patent drawing
  • US12127203B2 patent drawing
  • US12127203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method and a device in a node for wireless communications. A first node transmits a first signal in a first cell, and transmits a second signal in a second cell; a serving cell identity of the first cell is a first ID, and a serving cell identity of the second cell is a second ID, the first ID being smaller than the second ID; when the second cell is capable of scheduling a target cell, the second signal comprises first UCI; when the second cell is incapable of scheduling a target cell, the first signal comprises the first UCI. By associating whether a cell can piggyback UCI with whether a cell can schedule a PCell, the present disclosure manages to optimize UCI transmitting under Cross-Carrier Scheduling, hence improving the entire system's performance.