UDAR 3D Inversion Using Discrete Voxel Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D processing methods for ultra-deep azimuthal resistivity (UDAR) measurements employ approximate computational domain discretization, leading to smoothened formation mapping with artifacts away from the borehole, compromising higher resolution and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving UDAR measurements from a downhole tool, determining a data processing window based on the relative location of the transmitter, performing a three-dimensional (3D) inversion of the measurements, and generating an anisotropic resistivity distribution output. This approach uses exact full 3D EM solvers for accurate and high-resolution processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If approximate computational domain discretization is used for 3D processing, then processing speed is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to smoothened formation mapping and artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidformation mapping accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the 3D processing domain into discrete computational elements (voxels or finite elements) with exact geometric boundaries. This segmentation allows the electromagnetic field equations to be solved precisely at each discrete location without approximation, eliminating the smoothening artifacts that occur with continuous approximate discretization while maintaining computational efficiency through systematic grid-based processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the discretization parameter from approximate continuous domain representation to exact discrete voxel/element representation. By transforming the mathematical model from continuous approximate solutions to discrete exact solutions on a computational grid, the method achieves both high processing speed through algorithmic efficiency and high measurement precision through exact field calculations at each discrete point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If exact full 3D EM solvers are used for accurate processing, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistivity distribution accuracyVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transforms the complex full 3D electromagnetic inversion problem into a more manageable form by changing parameters: (1) discretizing the continuous 3D space into a finite voxel grid, (2) formulating the forward model using efficient finite difference or finite element methods on this grid, and (3) applying regularized inversion algorithms that exploit the structured nature of the discretized system. This parameter transformation reduces computational complexity while maintaining exactness in the forward modeling stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the complex 3D inversion problem into smaller, more manageable computational tasks: (1) forward modeling at each voxel location, (2) Jacobian matrix computation for sensitivity analysis, and (3) iterative inversion updates. This segmentation of the computational process allows exact full 3D EM solving to be performed through systematic, modular operations rather than as a single complex monolithic calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If high resolution 3D reservoir mapping is achieved, then asset recovery is increased, but well construction costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereservoir characterization accuracyVSAvoidwell construction costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies partial action by processing only the essential UDAR measurements that provide the most critical reservoir information. Rather than attempting to process all possible measurements or achieve maximum theoretical resolution, the method selectively processes the subset of measurements that deliver sufficient reservoir characterization for drilling decisions, thereby reducing computational costs while maintaining adequate asset recovery information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary 3D processing and formation evaluation before actual drilling operations. By obtaining high-resolution resistivity maps in advance through rapid 3D inversion of UDAR data, the system allows for optimal well path planning and reservoir targeting, which reduces unnecessary drilling operations and associated costs while maximizing asset recovery from productive zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high accuracy and resolution in real-time, providing precise 3D reservoir mapping that enhances drilling performance, increases asset recovery, and reduces well construction costs.

Implementation Method 1

an electromagnetic downhole tool configured to generate electromagnetic measurements associated with a volume within a geological formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250109678A1Discrete perforating device
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20250109678A1 patent drawing
  • US20250109678A1 patent drawing
  • US20250109678A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method that includes receiving ultra-deep azimuthal resistivity (UDAR) measurements from a downhole tool within a geological formation. The method also includes determining a data processing window based on a relative location of a transmitter of the downhole tool with respect to a location of one or more components of the downhole tool. Further, the method includes performing a three-dimensional (3D) inversion of the UDAR measurements based on the relative location of the transmitter. Further still, the method includes generating an anisotropic resistivity distribution and relative formation dip output based on the 3D inversion.