5G UDM Timestamping for Call Event Debugging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 5G telecommunication networks, errors during data transmission between the Unified Data Management (UDM) and Unified Data Repository (UDR) are difficult to debug due to the lack of timestamping, making it challenging to identify which interface call event caused failures for subscribers or user equipment (UE).

Innovation Solution

Incorporating timestamps in messages sent from the UDM to the UDR, allowing for tracking and debugging of call events by indicating the transmission time, which facilitates the auditing and debugging of interworking cases such as 4G/5G handovers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If timestamping is added to messages between UDM and UDR, then debugging capability is improved, but message complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging capabilityVSAvoidmessage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The timestamp is generated and included in the message at the moment of message creation, before transmission occurs. This preliminary action of pre-tagging messages with temporal information enables subsequent debugging and tracking operations without requiring additional complexity during message processing or analysis phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The timestamp acts as an intermediary element that carries temporal information between the UDM and UDR components. This intermediate data element facilitates the debugging process by providing a reference point for event sequencing and correlation, while maintaining a simple structure that does not significantly increase overall message complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If timestamps are included in all messages, then event tracking precision is improved, but data transmission overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent tracking precisionVSAvoiddata transmission overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The timestamping approach applies differentiation based on local needs: mandatory timestamps are included in messages where precise event tracking is critical for debugging and auditing, while other messages may use optional or simplified timestamping. This local quality approach ensures high measurement precision where needed without uniformly increasing data overhead across all message types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11689915B1System and method for 5G telecommunication call event timestamping
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US11689915B1 patent drawing
  • US11689915B1 patent drawing
  • US11689915B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for 5G telecommunication call event timestamping to assist in debugging the flow of call events, such as during roaming, handover operations, or when user equipment (UE) accesses a different network slice. Specifically, a system for the provision of wireless telecommunication services can include a core network having a first UDR and a first UDM. The first UDM, upon receiving communication from one or more network functions, can communicate a first message to the first UDR. The first message can include a first timestamp indicating to the first UDR a first time that the first message was transmitted.