UE Radio Capability Filtering to Avoid Network Rejections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

User Equipment (UE) may autonomously attempt to communicate using restricted radio capabilities, leading to increased latency and power loss due to network rejections.

Innovation Solution

A network-controlled mechanism where the network identifies restricted radio capabilities based on UE subscription information, transmits a UE radio capability modification indication, and the UE disables these capabilities, ensuring communication only through non-restricted capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the UE autonomously attempts to communicate using multiple radio capabilities, then the UE can maintain communication flexibility and support multiple networks, but the UE experiences increased latency and power loss due to network rejections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradio capability flexibilityVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network performs preliminary action by identifying and filtering restricted radio capabilities from the UE's supported capabilities before the UE attempts communication. The network sends a capability modification indication to the UE in advance, allowing the UE to proactively disable restricted capabilities and avoid unnecessary communication attempts, thereby reducing latency while maintaining flexibility for non-restricted capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network provides feedback to the UE by transmitting a capability modification indication that informs the UE which radio capabilities are restricted. This feedback mechanism allows the UE to adjust its behavior accordingly, disabling only the restricted capabilities while maintaining others, thus resolving the contradiction between communication flexibility and latency reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the UE autonomously attempts to communicate using multiple radio capabilities, then the UE can maintain communication flexibility, but the UE experiences increased power loss due to repeated communication attempts and rejections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradio capability flexibilityVSAvoidUE power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The network performs preliminary action by filtering restricted capabilities and sending the capability modification indication to the UE before the UE expends energy on unsuccessful communication attempts. This allows the UE to proactively disable restricted capabilities, avoiding wasted power while maintaining flexibility for non-restricted capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network provides feedback through the capability modification indication, enabling the UE to make informed decisions about which capabilities to use. This feedback loop prevents the UE from wasting energy on restricted capabilities while preserving energy efficiency for allowed capabilities, resolving the contradiction between flexibility and power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the network filters restricted radio capabilities from the UE's supported capabilities, then communication reliability is improved, but additional signaling overhead is introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network extracts only the necessary information (capability modification indication) from the UE's full capability set and sends it to the UE. This extraction approach improves reliability by providing targeted guidance on restricted capabilities while minimizing signaling overhead by transmitting only the essential modification information rather than complete capability sets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The network changes the parameter state by sending a capability modification indication that alters the UE's operational capabilities. This parameter change approach improves reliability by ensuring the UE operates only with allowed capabilities while keeping signaling overhead low through efficient parameter representation and transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4248671B1Network-controlled disabling of user equipment (UE) radio capabilities
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP4248671B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4248671B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4248671B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. To communicate using non-restricted radio capabilities, a user equipment (UE) may transmit a UE capability message to a network (e.g., via a base station) that indicates a set of radio capabilities that the UE may use to communicate. The network may identify subscription information for the UE and may determine one or more restricted radio capabilities of the set of radio capabilities based on the subscription information for the UE. The network may transmit a message to the UE that includes a radio capability modification indication indicating the one or more restricted radio capabilities and a UE radio capability identifier corresponding to the subset of radio capabilities of the set of radio capabilities that are not restricted. The UE may receive the message, identify the restricted radio capabilities, and communicate with the network using the subset of non-restricted radio capabilities.