UE Capability Pooling for Flexible Wireless Network Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless telecommunication network testing requires dedicated UEs, leading to high idle time and a large number of devices, as they are uniquely identified, making it difficult to replace failing devices and maintain a sufficient number for testing.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows UEs to be requested based on technical capabilities at an abstract level, enabling multiple devices to satisfy requirements, forming device pools, and managing reservations to optimize device utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dedicated UEs are used for testing, then testing reliability is improved, but device utilization deteriorates due to high idle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting reliabilityVSAvoiddevice utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a device pool where multiple UEs with different technical capabilities are registered and categorized. The testing system can allocate any suitable device from the pool based on test requirements, allowing devices to serve multiple testing purposes rather than being dedicated to single tests. This multi-functional approach ensures reliable testing while improving device utilization by reducing idle time between tests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If dedicated UEs are used for testing, then testing reliability is improved, but the number of devices required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple dedicated testing devices into a single shared device pool. By combining resources and implementing centralized management, the system can allocate devices dynamically across multiple testing scenarios. This reduces the total number of devices needed while maintaining testing reliability through proper device selection and capability matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a device recovery mechanism where UEs are returned to the pool after testing completion or failure. Instead of discarding failed devices or maintaining them in a fixed dedicated state, the system recovers them and makes them available for reassignment to other tests. This maximizes device utilization and reduces the total number of devices required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of operation

If UEs are uniquely identified, then device tracking is simplified, but device replacement flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice trackingVSAvoiddevice replacement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the testing system and individual UEs. The device pool management system acts as a mediator that handles device identification, tracking, and allocation. This intermediary maintains tracking information while enabling flexible replacement by managing the mapping between test requirements and available devices, thus preserving both tracking simplicity and replacement flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260025683A1INCREASING UTILIZATION OF UEs USED IN TESTING A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 T MOBILE US INC
  • US20260025683A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025683A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025683A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The system obtains multiple unique identifiers associated with multiple UEs, where a unique identifier among the multiple unique identifiers identifies a UE among the multiple UEs. Based on the unique identifier, the system determines multiple technical capabilities associated with the multiple UEs. The system receives a request for one or more UEs, where the request includes a number of the one or more UEs and a desired technical capability associated with the one or more UEs, and where the request is specified at a level of abstraction that allows more than one UE among the multiple UEs to satisfy the request. Based on the request for the one or more UEs and the multiple technical capabilities associated with the multiple UEs, the system determines a subset of the multiple UEs satisfying the request, and sends a response to the request indicating the subset of the multiple UEs satisfying the request.