UE Feedback Signaling Power Control via Scheduling Assignment Difference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power control methods in radio access networks, particularly in 5G networks, face challenges in accurately estimating the power level for reliable transmission of feedback signaling, leading to inefficiencies in resource utilization and interference management.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where user equipment (UE) calculates the power level for feedback signaling based on the difference between expected and received scheduling assignments, using values V and U, which represent total and actual scheduling assignments across cells, carriers, and bandwidth parts, to improve the accuracy of power control and reduce missed assignments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmission power is increased to ensure reliable reception of feedback signaling, then reception reliability is improved, but interference with other signaling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception reliabilityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the power control parameter from a fixed or简单地 calculated value to one that is dynamically adjusted based on the difference between expected and received scheduling assignments. This parameter change allows the system to adapt transmission power to actual channel conditions and assignment reception status, achieving reliable reception while minimizing unnecessary interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the UE monitors scheduling assignments and provides feedback about missed assignments. The network uses this feedback to adjust power control parameters, creating a closed-loop system that optimizes transmission power based on actual reception conditions, thereby improving reliability while controlling interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If transmission power is decreased to limit interference, then interference is reduced, but reception reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidreception reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts transmission power parameters based on the difference between expected and received scheduling assignments. When missed assignments are detected, the system increases power for critical signaling; when assignments are received successfully, power is reduced to minimize interference, thus resolving the contradiction between interference reduction and reliability maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic power control that adapts to changing channel conditions and assignment reception status. Rather than using fixed power levels, the system continuously adjusts power based on real-time feedback about scheduling assignment reception, enabling it to maintain reliability when needed and reduce interference when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If power control accuracy is improved for feedback signaling, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent improves power control accuracy by changing the parameter calculation method to use the difference between expected and received scheduling assignments. This parameter change enhances resource utilization efficiency by ensuring appropriate power levels for feedback signaling without requiring complex additional mechanisms, thus improving productivity with minimal complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the number of scheduling assignments is increased to improve resource allocation, then resource allocation capability is improved, but power control accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation capabilityVSAvoidpower control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback monitoring of scheduling assignment reception to maintain power control accuracy even when the number of assignments increases. By tracking which assignments are successfully received and which are missed, the system can adjust power levels accordingly, ensuring accurate power control despite higher resource allocation capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts power control parameters based on the actual number of received scheduling assignments versus expected assignments. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain accurate power control even when handling a large number of assignments across multiple cells, carriers, and bandwidth parts, thus resolving the contradiction between resource allocation capability and power control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12199779B2Power control for feedback signaling
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12199779B2 patent drawing
  • US12199779B2 patent drawing
  • US12199779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed a method of operating a user equipment in a radio access network. The method includes transmitting feedback signaling pertaining to a plurality of cells, the feedback signaling being transmitted at a power level, the power level being based on a difference between a value V and a value U, the value V being indicative of the total number of scheduling assignments the user equipment is expected to receive for the plurality of cells, and the value U being indicative of the total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells received by the user equipment. The disclosure also pertains to related devices and methods.